IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Curdle] FW: New Version Notification for draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-00.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7710312952D for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 11:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Oe0pmtyxWPL for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x229.google.com (mail-yb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8BB91292FC for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 8so2314885ybw.1 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tSDmUDOP86dBj3vProxhmJRAKnU4n6Ev9IS+ISwqo2s=; b=tOE8aXLOBtd1qrkJA6xSVVnxMEAwKkrcASfjBEWzjarg5h/iCI8qAl0+Emq9V/lCQO PUv9lsyGEj6c9HKt0I/XDi+CuNMaQBoUIYN5w4ZrnWEjJAC+C9p+fxDaOPppmMnpZg/Y aNPOGqZ0+EvyoKLc9Hi9rEO+yhrdCs0pXef+RDxkV7OtXTfV7bELp5SG6Jcyw5fX8bw9 guchX70cHn5+raayDz3xnOq0G3CYVhh5U6cRN7wbLCeQ5UY6V+XexiToKzkOE75I/L0I vPILka3wmIv8D/+7XDc+ZF0LLL7HmnZxLrJ3VDYKouXmnsIbWwnj/UpjaNZcVxNh7gSZ x1bA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tSDmUDOP86dBj3vProxhmJRAKnU4n6Ev9IS+ISwqo2s=; b=kNQ/qAtUWsh5oJc9sD73ZlY6pNXhTJLfWgN0QlgP2N35vQrBAVQu/4Bj0cpcG3IMFb nDstUFG/6Mi63iyhLZCqHBHktThb6dRWyN3od3m+Dy2WuwEqP5aweOoojrBWkvfrVT2J 3xK2fNNjCOT/z3RI1aDidoqCoNKYtU3oXquRbvT8h9FtWtSBIng6E7ir6HUKhqpFS+2a rZTh5OVSrd8bpWr969jhMw8JasYMJ0mfHM0Ft6JhOiIXP4eUM8Y0OwrWRpA3Nkw3I+zB zJ1sACx2wHO8LhgAoG3qEcRAW+K/lktSSDdzhUcKscHiMStJWYuuMPqCPYx6tUlJvu/P 0nRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDm3GHOU/ieeH1WHJ1av0QOdQ0xH+gg3Lr1tpXokoORLBWmkIBP L513j5HPuJtqWzL1ajH/Wm2MzvKHU/I3
X-Received: by 10.37.161.196 with SMTP id a62mr1324725ybi.9.1494353302797; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.131.150 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 11:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170509055301.GB30306@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <149426463707.11242.13594573268237847336.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <007b01d2c821$5f8eb670$1eac2350$@augustcellars.com> <CABkgnnXzpw_WuRJFptEME0kL=fmaRQkpFn4O7zQFPed3eThX4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170509051032.GZ30306@kduck.kaduk.org> <CABkgnnXLws6SA4ppqtyDFLnVLHysvR4QGjf2_zXfV4=gKnxS6g@mail.gmail.com> <20170509055301.GB30306@kduck.kaduk.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 11:07:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNFUR+v5kY4DQjqsvKrE+cZ2O96Y4mmjoZNQb6V3wsKhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c5632c8f1da054f1b3d4f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/avLgwlDNDlbr0CII0lgO-2mBI10>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] FW: New Version Notification for draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 18:08:25 -0000

Speaking as AD, I am trying to minimize AD sponsorship, especially when
there is an existing group. Therefore, I would favor the WG process in this
case.

-Ekr


On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 03:26:59PM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On 9 May 2017 at 15:10, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> > > It's uncontroversial and the AD-sponsored path might shave a couple
> > > weeks off it?
> >
> >
> > I'm pushing back on this pattern when I see it.  AD sponsorship puts
> > more work on an individual; the same goes for publication on the
> > independent stream.
>
> You asked for "any reason", not "any good reason" :-P
> You're right to push back on it...
>
> > If there is a problem with the efficiency of working groups, using
> > these alternative routes lets the problem fester. I suspect that -
> > more often than not - the problem is lack of energy or lack of
> > consensus.
>
> Lots of lack of energy in places I frequent, alas.
>
> -Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> Curdle mailing list
> Curdle@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email