Re: [dane] Future working group documents
Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 11 November 2014 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E13A1A00E5 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJCFHwXUaXER for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51441A0110 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id E87202AB2F6; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:43:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:43:19 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141111174319.GV161@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <1415675350.32919149@apps.rackspace.com> <20141111051827.GR161@mournblade.imrryr.org> <8D065AE0-DF9B-45D2-AE9D-F964A8396EAF@ogud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8D065AE0-DF9B-45D2-AE9D-F964A8396EAF@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/CHhOJorW5fzc19f3AnxKQ-jyC-8
Subject: Re: [dane] Future working group documents
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dane@ietf.org
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:43:46 -0000
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:00:09PM -1000, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > > Perhaps before we advance 6698 to full standard we really should > > do a TLSAbis, incorporating the relevant bits of OPS. The standard > > would be far more readable if it were not substantially refined by > > a second document that is not in turn a full replacement. > > What that was meant to be a single document covering both of these Is that a question or a statement? For my part, I'd like to see DANE TLSA (6698) bis, with the relevant bits from OPS inlined into the main document. Though first we need to get OPS published. -- Viktor.
- [dane] Future working group documents ogud
- Re: [dane] Future working group documents Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [dane] Future working group documents Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Future working group documents Viktor Dukhovni