Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at IETF 95
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 12:55 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539481B4019 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 04:55:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iVZQ7UPR234 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 04:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31791B4057 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 04:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 75246 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2016 12:55:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Mar 2016 12:55:13 -0000
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:54:50 -0000
Message-ID: <20160307125450.1161.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dane@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <56DD1DB7.7050305@seantek.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/JawYl1Ojk5SuV5bU7xMtu28-AXA>
Subject: Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at IETF 95
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:55:23 -0000
In article <56DD1DB7.7050305@seantek.com> you write: >Hello: > >As the chairs graciously requested and got a meeting slot in Buenos >Aires, I would like to request DANE ALPS (Alternative Local-Part >Synthesis) discussion time at IETF 95. This draft belongs in ietf-smtp or maybe appsarea, not DANE. It's an interesting idea, but since it changes the rules about who interprets local-parts, it's an update to RFC 5321. Also, it's an issue that affects people in a lot of places other than DANE. Pkix has been having somewhat similar discussions about the names in X.509 certificates. R's, John
- [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at IETF … Sean Leonard
- Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at I… John Levine
- Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at I… Sean Leonard
- Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS (another attempt to … John R Levine
- Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at I… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dane] Request DANE ALPS discussion time at I… Sean Leonard