IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Is running a DANE nameserver for a TLD as complex as running a CA?

"Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> Tue, 28 July 2015 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97961A889F for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Br-Zg8_OVKwJ for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f100.google.com (mail-qg0-f100.google.com [209.85.192.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B884A1A889B for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgii95 with SMTP id i95so6333511qgi.0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :user-agent:content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=NqZzYqb+THkTyc39a1pylNMhS260l/9WKYhs7jG1CFs=; b=Pvycx1+g+LbeXJPAhETznKi/+bgDuys+ZJLISZf4e+3Su6T3wCf5oU2SSDTjz5PIc6 S9xirRVYuSHanlTWIAeTk/VxsroUdxhkEvT+p+m4IfJPuij8LT82xL6vJ8aEYWaetFYf eUfIcL2mOiHWiEpxl6iT58D2znQV9XIqWh1Cx/6fxWIzyQWXf4wRo32hiwFIrTixynB4 aH436Ruqu6mYdVJ2VpjTM5/pdrdV1o+5mriqmSRzadGJPSZWacWh3sx4VtJidnpTs/tp Q1eFa18DdhxYvfxm8sBs47EhX1kHDMnr3RzjCI1HftCavNk6XbyDgqZuohjQMsKEvGZF FqWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeF38m2tt/MVCHGcx/7CdARCYqbSIymqPtvZMPqnRx8v7y/DqqhHhX2FYCJnj+6weMdCgR/QA+ci6j4/+YRYkj2YTKrw==
X-Received: by 10.140.31.194 with SMTP id f60mr48026355qgf.23.1438080764999; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 17sm6535179qky.3.2015.07.28.03.52.44 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6SAqi6C014746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:52:44 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:52:43 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: Coyo <coyo@darkdna.net>, "dane@ietf.org" <dane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dane] Is running a DANE nameserver for a TLD as complex as running a CA?
Thread-Index: AQHQySOHhXevLnNU0EqduJTaothWpg==
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:52:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D1DCD6AA.1602B%gwiley@verisign.com>
References: <CAMm+LwhYdBLXM8Td8q8SCnzgwywRgMx3wNKeS_Q0JSN4Lh7rZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87si8dagiz.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250656400.854@bofh.nohats.ca> <20150726093802.763f57e77d2810e4f4facc14@darkdna.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150726093802.763f57e77d2810e4f4facc14@darkdna.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <9337229221E64E448B1FDC269CE49675@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/V6ExXv5nBuBvs6IX8zVLeQEz16s>
Subject: Re: [dane] Is running a DANE nameserver for a TLD as complex as running a CA?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:52:48 -0000

It might help if you offered more specific points to your question.
Serving DANE style records for a TLD probably doesn¹t make much sense as
those records have more meaning for a SLD.  Are you asking about running a
DNSSEC capable name server or serving a signed zone?

-- 
Glen Wiley

Principal Engineer
Verisign, Inc.
(571) 230-7917

http://vbsdcon.com

A5E5 E373 3C75 5B3E 2E24
6A0F DC65 2354 9946 C63A




On 7/26/15, 10:38 AM, "Coyo" <coyo@darkdna.net> wrote:

>Or am I fundementally misunderstanding something?
>
>I apologize in advance if this seems like a dumb question, but I was not
>able to find a definitive answer.
>
>_______________________________________________
>dane mailing list
>dane@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email