IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dane] Is running a DANE nameserver for a TLD as complex as running a CA?

Coyo <coyo@darkdna.net> Sun, 26 July 2015 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <coyo@darkdna.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBC01A89C7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5_4lFeoGUmM for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ryujin.darkdna.net (ryujin.darkdna.net [IPv6:2600:3c00::2:ffff]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D43D1A898B for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:fdcf:3c00:e001::101]) by ryujin.darkdna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3mfRhJ6BSzz19bW for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:38:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ryujin.darkdna.net ([IPv6:fdcf:3c00:e001::100]) by localhost (otohime.darkdna.net [IPv6:fdcf:3c00:e001::101]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FIP7gbJ0olhS for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from coyo-K55VJ (pool-71-164-173-165.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.164.173.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ryujin.darkdna.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mfRhB3DHQz19bV for <dane@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=darkdna.net; s=mail; t=1437921482; bh=3SH9JBkdn7SHkzvQKDyLz8gCwPebS0ypdIraDUX9Hkk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=tkiXXCfLgGh4FEd188mKJ5A2hx74e60zVSYCVx0CXha1O+NdW4MIX53K3yXp5zS/t 8ui5IdLQUzU2kGexSvrgsvFw1a7DF3CnbW7r3T4IQbnLwkHVgHB6e5RHw2LSHkF0C0 4rQzTsQkAbghuIPaFDCyOSXllZ+BHae9TmzTzxYg=
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:38:02 -0500
From: Coyo <coyo@darkdna.net>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20150726093802.763f57e77d2810e4f4facc14@darkdna.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250656400.854@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAMm+LwhYdBLXM8Td8q8SCnzgwywRgMx3wNKeS_Q0JSN4Lh7rZQ@mail.gmail.com> <87si8dagiz.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250656400.854@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/fJbG-1J15FDTma2RVPxa7eT8Qqc>
Subject: [dane] Is running a DANE nameserver for a TLD as complex as running a CA?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 14:38:14 -0000

Or am I fundementally misunderstanding something?

I apologize in advance if this seems like a dumb question, but I was not able to find a definitive answer.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email