IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dane] Use OPENPGPKEY or SMIMEA if both are available?

Patrick Ben Koetter <p@sys4.de> Mon, 09 March 2015 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <p@sys4.de>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F831A901F for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otD6Lpr23N5u for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sys4.de (mail.sys4.de [IPv6:2001:1578:400:111::7]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52DEB1AC40F for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sys4.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date; s=mail201310; t=1425931186; x=1427745587; bh=XG+GLqU Zm/pqruFu9R5nPhZEKHRGIB9nToX79a7kb80=; b=xQiHocpFNVBcIKDRmUFgPCi aQLH7aR36o0ERoxcNhm7vbK6GZRnJj9HwpSjy56tBvUq0u1HWYj2N3Fk8gyWz0YN Kz9AaeOLqP1ppbUmd31nzp3uq5DyavCnn6QmB/9WXtk2WGmwrcHzBxGzPDWHFOY+ Vj3lOKjwpT32FYV60eid+AXril31zaJKALSsrZjb2LvjsdD8kZSpX64GLUPa1NZg 8jzylvP4Qmqio7+hgRr0DuQh7UV7mmXNwI/cFrr8lFjG4p+jOqsnps4Jz8pI7z4R rC9g6nW0mVi194avDGLO/H8W/eAhciF/3sTVb/B3Dvfj8rNIFnTWo5VXesTuWhQ= =
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sys4.de
Received: from sys4.de (ipb21b19f6.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [178.27.25.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sys4.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3l19PZ5V2CzFy for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:59:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:59:45 +0100
From: Patrick Ben Koetter <p@sys4.de>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150309195944.GB8242@sys4.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/t0Gm8zTvV3nzWIMu0NfeVG-CA_c>
Subject: [dane] Use OPENPGPKEY or SMIMEA if both are available?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:59:59 -0000

Greetings,

while thinking about OPENPGPKEY and SMIMEA I came across this question:

What if a recipient publishes both, an OPENPGPKEY and a SMIMEA RR in DNS and
what if a sender (MUA/MTA Filter) is capable to encrypt messages for both
standars S/MIME and PGP.

Which should the sender prefer? Could the receiver indicate a preference?

Has there been any discussion on this? Should there be? Did it take place and
I missed it?

p@rick

-- 
[*] sys4 AG
 
https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email