IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E661A90B4 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pmz9KHrV8qbZ for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E301A9026 for <DANE@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1425928399; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=ujkqqeXbGBJL9uJP4JgIWBf3+XqxSm4RoeMLgNQtSjI=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=Rm3//wL5YDtIDwDI4vjgdvtwEEP6rg8O0CD+0+gBd2mO8BWNs+v05M8U5PvCps19DusxCL dfdFga/5BeILeibokTROUV4NTDlEat7I0mAXZWe0UJzOk/92Pv4MUEUWnU/cprhGQw5MrJ QIJHwAtbDuSwE7eyD0g9MxQhEi4OTsU=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VP3wywBB7VPu@waldorf.isode.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:13:19 +0000
Message-ID: <54FDF0CB.5070203@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:13:15 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "<dane@ietf.org>" <DANE@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey@tools.ietf.org, DANE-chairs <DANE-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
References: <CAHw9_iJPuG23Aok7V_wcAMirua_DPDLHy01tnd+DaUqEeK3NZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKU=inVWUJkj4oR7zc5Fh-ejJRpLfURaeF8J4AxCcz_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKU=inVWUJkj4oR7zc5Fh-ejJRpLfURaeF8J4AxCcz_BQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/8GM5f_AE8CcV1o-9X8c_RE3eego>
Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:13:55 -0000

On 09/03/2015 15:43, Warren Kumari wrote:
> [ Top post ]
>
> So, we have had a reasonable amount of discussion here, but only from
> a limited number of participants. In many cases it is unclear to me if
> people are OK with progressing hte document (once their comments are
> addressed), or if they dislike the document...
>
> So, I'm extending this till this Friday (Friday the 13th!). Paul W
> will also be releasing a new version of this document with many of the
> comments integrated. Can people please have a look at the new version
> (I think it will be out in a few hours), and let me know if:
> A: their comments / issues have been addressed, and
> B: are you OK with the general document? A clear "Yes, this is good"
> or "No, worst idea ever" would be useful.
>
> I'd really like more then 3 or 4 people commenting.
Late review of the document:

The document looks good to me and I support its publication. Some 
nits/minor things:

2.3.  The OPENPGPKEY RDATA presentation format

    The RDATA Presentation Format, as visible in textual zone files,
    consists of a single OpenPGP public key as defined in
    Section 5.5.1.1. of [RFC4880] encoded in Base64 [RFC4648]

  The base64 section should say "Section 4 of [RFC4648]". Because there 
is also section 5, which uses a diffent alphabet.

In 3.1:

o  Everything after a "+" symbol is dynamc.

Typo: dynamic.

If you want an informative reference here, you can reference RFC 5233.

      hugh+string@example.com
       maps to hugh@example.com.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email