Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:31:09PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> > I don't have a pointer to my original proposal handy,
>> > check the archives.  It is something along these lines.
>>
>> I *think* that the proposal is in this email:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg07163.html
>> (Viktor, 11 Dec 2014)
>
> Yes, thanks that the correct, more complete description.
>
> The difference between that and what I wrote down from memory
> today is the placement of the tag:
>
>         @lower:local-part-with-quotes-if-needed
>
> vs.
>
>         local-part-with-quotes-if-needed@lowercase
>
> These are trivial variations of the same thing, perhaps today's
> @lowercase suffix is more natural, but I don't really care which
> if either is selected, if this general approach is chosen.
>
> Is there rough consensus behind this proposal (for both OPENPGPKEY
> and SMIMEA)?

I think we were very close to rough consensus, but I'm not sure how
many people actually read the suggestion. I know not everyone loved
the idea, but I think it might be the best that we can do....

Viktor, would you mind writing up the proposal again (in a new thread)
and we'll call consensus on this approach?

W

>
> --
>         Viktor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf