IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 25 February 2015 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737341A1AA5 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDIW5dXhvzhE for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE2E1A1AB0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ex7so6780945wid.0 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HsfYq7bKsNPkwB0Itqrz9z0F7VGV/Gj/UHZI5WvOt4E=; b=LgiCP9IanvTgtzjcN7r9/TrVNx7o6UsxibXSsKY9uhroSv/IY4gW5lsmaZIAE9MAuo dHKE1muUaQ8oMe5SCXuxjotY08CNvcWqlJmmISJTG1YesZNDdA2lMoJ/v1SvlvVDzjMx X7RaizajzQsgGFg6Sb7Y45laoDVF9Tb/eIzIk4H+jRsNd3BV37IIim8hJp7MYvzIAYRm ZPBnKvFoILJvIJoN7DuV8CKMzUlJFnEHFaD0BXDM9cYVKV9ZZPR1cu3urdhlMRMbrgGg Fw/AFS4qWNBkuooKWKqmSokMpndln2iDHAeS7tFzj96EmoEdiUWKSu31cuk/p1F7A0pV 1a1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlwyxYqK8tnqg62qBn3B0U8L4cKweKcaNzMOiINUM7aFef/ZGa86teNFgDMUYUVptZxuod2
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.111 with SMTP id s15mr8192293wiv.61.1424885190201; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.158.229 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:26:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3A75EA8C-C6FD-4412-BC3C-A34CDA7023D2@nist.gov>
References: <CAHw9_iJPuG23Aok7V_wcAMirua_DPDLHy01tnd+DaUqEeK3NZA@mail.gmail.com> <001a01d04f19$b0292e90$107b8bb0$@augustcellars.com> <20150223035230.GD1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <001b01d04f1c$f626c940$e2745bc0$@augustcellars.com> <20150223040833.GF1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <CAHw9_iJ167aCbpW=Fni0h_vsWLcWQVLC1P7vkr6X0cmAV9zG=g@mail.gmail.com> <3A75EA8C-C6FD-4412-BC3C-A34CDA7023D2@nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:26:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLyCm1pwQ2eeZihxh29eQ4og6S4wbTS1PKtKVY4c2mz_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Jbl3OGXZMXg1TSYrd6CMSCcVqfY>
Cc: "<dane@ietf.org>" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:26:34 -0000

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Rose, Scott W. <scott.rose@nist.gov> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>> [ Meta top post ]
>>
>> I'd like to also draw attention to the "companion" document
>> draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage (
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage/ ),
>> which describes usage of openpgpkey records, and following CNAMES.
>>
>
> Is this also in WGLC?  Either way, some comments:

It is NOT currently in WGLC -- but the comments are appreciated.

Would the WG like to WGLC this at the same time? Olafur and I has a
discussion about this - he figured it should be included, I thought
better to hold off - I'm happy to start a WGLC if folk want that.

W

>
> - In section 1 (Intro), there is an incorrect XML tag (xref)
>
> - In Section 3.3 Final paragraph about wildcards:  ...at other locations (e.g. hugh@*.com) or regular expressions in keu uids are not allowed, adn any OPENPGPKEY RR containing these should be ignored."
>
> Should that be a SHOULD above?  It discusses implementation behavior in addition to what is already described in Sections 4.3 & 4.4.
>
> - In Section 3.4 spelling s/Resoruce/Resource and s/accomodate/accommodate
>
> - In Section 4. s/twart/thwart
>
> At least I assume that last one - my spell checker gets confused about UK vs. US english.
>
> Scott
>
> ===================================
> Scott Rose
> NIST
> scott.rose@nist.gov
> +1 301-975-8439
> Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
> http://www.dnsops.gov/
> https://www.had-pilot.com/
> ===================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email