[dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 20 February 2015 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504A21A0060 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIRoTC8NZkPA for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8351A0006 for <DANE@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z12so15339939wgg.2 for <DANE@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1eqOBZ5VJ9zywlVYK3QDWhdx+W+l5obAZqLvlnr3Clw=; b=RQ6mUXTQU0afCWe4FkyVSmyTYn7ljBn8Pw31ghCraIx61Dji4lsGooqgKV0PftG+Z4 lhEkt4oS3V1M7l+MtqGbXatu+QlRDOwYYT775XXI2Et2xcyGItRa2o3ftBttPw+NMVQk 6KFZI0fpvL6cR1heWAdwSia/LDYTUC3vq/Uwvh8QG0FOA4+HytOyFrJ0pGkjZTmDZWjb KN8RqkVrrz0MoViJbABmOJwvCYFHH5QpEKtUM/7QJfRx/k1ivTxpo0AnxJxQSaNlzpsb Xo4JUgV4czuy5EwRmaK5kt2S07XGmFnRvWoDk/NaEAanPLI9kr49BjZ0MpAwwBFtMzSg wM1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzzqsW4+qzrh4SmDkzbBIVtS33ZUAPWXVtNNbrC6iaKRf6IMFHoHIfgHRm49ShQwLSRha7
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.63.16 with SMTP id c16mr22462842wjs.117.1424464205890; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.158.229 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:30:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJPuG23Aok7V_wcAMirua_DPDLHy01tnd+DaUqEeK3NZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "<dane@ietf.org>" <DANE@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey@tools.ietf.org, DANE-chairs <DANE-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/5oa5y4LNGkPrnB3eGfGDW8S1glU>
Subject: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:30:13 -0000

Dear DANE WG,

The author of draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey has indicated that he
believes that the document is ready for Working Group Last Call.
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/

This document has been discussed a number of times, to jog your
memory, here is one slidedeck:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-dane-2.pdf
Also, a cute trick: dig type61 $(echo -n pwouters| sha224sum | sed "s/
.*$//")._openpgpkey.fedoraproject.org |grep TYPE61 | sed
"s/^.*TYPE61.*\\\#[0-9]* //" | grep -v ";" | sed "s/ //g" | xxd -r -p
| gpg --import --dry-run


Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for
publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

This WGLC ends Fri 06-Mar-2015.



In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378
for more details.)

Thanks,
Warren Kumari
(as DANE WG co-chair)

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf