IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sat, 14 March 2015 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ECA1A0194 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WnIlPax6uVvt for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63881A0193 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obdfc2 with SMTP id fc2so11105979obd.3 for <dane@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ei4B+/vB7zPtZNNwzn/GvNnOnwrR9/SqIT74j7eaUr4=; b=ILrH9aOhJR7AvEb7vbqnrx2OY1n/KUQwcm/TLb/aDQqSUD88iUnxQUGOvBEUeKsIhw W3K96vQM1wSOXw3J+n6BL/V75EESX409sxJMucWhrF63W8H92EfTQwMyP7X79RRGVmny RSULpjoHSOxyouffYhGTRNIMz9s1fY9AMwOvlnj6fyqms0ewwi4AXfl8ihHn9a+SDhh1 fZ8FN3GXUre63VhPpirDRY+ue3Y+x0i/5iufrq/okErrzYEjsagd1chFkdD/CJeWzPzg RRzIBemP5StwgJt/PQ2kt7m9nJ76tQvvrYEX4jA2xjeSMBRZbUC7fyExNE4z460hL3YP rK8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmyxP4EHSTwlwRoYZFzcoKWj9fO8T0Xc6p5J13P20+Jc6gyKSsgmzNAvZWVIhHAYxB3BQ/1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.66.136 with SMTP id p130mr40165808oia.110.1426361271286; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.79.86 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLafyHnbnii2huxoR48rybydu-tT4rScm6oo9p==ytkyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJPuG23Aok7V_wcAMirua_DPDLHy01tnd+DaUqEeK3NZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKU=inVWUJkj4oR7zc5Fh-ejJRpLfURaeF8J4AxCcz_BQ@mail.gmail.com> <5502E194.4020507@powerdns.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503131404400.22027@bofh.nohats.ca> <15467987-08AA-439A-99AB-22F813C0F841@isode.com> <CAHw9_iLafyHnbnii2huxoR48rybydu-tT4rScm6oo9p==ytkyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:27:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+wDiB8EaMb1_v-O3=uH5+jsZjOpzR+xSL7OHpY43wJcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/nzf4x0n0sqHoEhS61y1iy_ql5Dg>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "dane@ietf.org" <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 19:27:53 -0000

Oh yeah. I sent this all in a bit of a rush (while waiting for a cab).
I'm also writing this in a bit of a rush, but I'm still going to have
to chat with Olafur to try and figure out what we do with the whole
"many trees" / DNAME issues.
W

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your feedback and comments, the WGLC is now closed.
>
> I think that it looks like there is strong consensus for publishing,
> but I'm hoping to re-read all the comments on my flight home
> (currently sitting in TXL) to see if I've missed anything obvious...
>
> W
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Alexey Melnikov
> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13 Mar 2015, at 18:10, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>> Appendix A:
>>>> Two things: I suggest moving this to -usage and adding pseudocode
>>>> examples. The latter mostly to encourage more implementations.
>>>
>>> I thought about keeping it software agnostic, but in the end figured
>>> since gnupg has been around for over a decade, it is kind of similar
>>> to using openssl commands as example.
>>
>> I agree. Some real world usage is good.
>>
>>> But I have no problems making
>>> this software agnostic if the WG thinks that is more appropriate.
>>
>> More examples are always better :-). (I am not suggesting you change anything, if you can't think of any).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dane mailing list
>> dane@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email