Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Mon, 23 February 2015 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFCA1A034C for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:56:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nN1pbnpGCFAC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:56:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB7031A0262 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 0181A282F52; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:56:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:56:30 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150223225630.GO1260@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CAHw9_iJPuG23Aok7V_wcAMirua_DPDLHy01tnd+DaUqEeK3NZA@mail.gmail.com> <001a01d04f19$b0292e90$107b8bb0$@augustcellars.com> <20150223035230.GD1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <001b01d04f1c$f626c940$e2745bc0$@augustcellars.com> <20150223040833.GF1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <CAHw9_iJ167aCbpW=Fni0h_vsWLcWQVLC1P7vkr6X0cmAV9zG=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJ167aCbpW=Fni0h_vsWLcWQVLC1P7vkr6X0cmAV9zG=g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/HZeNjw5jJxm7hGxl22oVMIkj3gg>
Subject: Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dane@ietf.org
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:56:33 -0000

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:31:09PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:

> > I don't have a pointer to my original proposal handy,
> > check the archives.  It is something along these lines.
> 
> I *think* that the proposal is in this email:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg07163.html
> (Viktor, 11 Dec 2014)

Yes, thanks that the correct, more complete description.

The difference between that and what I wrote down from memory
today is the placement of the tag:

	@lower:local-part-with-quotes-if-needed

vs.

	local-part-with-quotes-if-needed@lowercase

These are trivial variations of the same thing, perhaps today's
@lowercase suffix is more natural, but I don't really care which
if either is selected, if this general approach is chosen.

Is there rough consensus behind this proposal (for both OPENPGPKEY
and SMIMEA)?

-- 
	Viktor.