Re: [dane] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey - *please* review.

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

[ Top post ]

So, we have had a reasonable amount of discussion here, but only from
a limited number of participants. In many cases it is unclear to me if
people are OK with progressing hte document (once their comments are
addressed), or if they dislike the document...

So, I'm extending this till this Friday (Friday the 13th!). Paul W
will also be releasing a new version of this document with many of the
comments integrated. Can people please have a look at the new version
(I think it will be out in a few hours), and let me know if:
A: their comments / issues have been addressed, and
B: are you OK with the general document? A clear "Yes, this is good"
or "No, worst idea ever" would be useful.

I'd really like more then 3 or 4 people commenting.
W



On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Dear DANE WG,
>
> The author of draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey has indicated that he
> believes that the document is ready for Working Group Last Call.
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/
>
> This document has been discussed a number of times, to jog your
> memory, here is one slidedeck:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-dane-2.pdf
> Also, a cute trick: dig type61 $(echo -n pwouters| sha224sum | sed "s/
> .*$//")._openpgpkey.fedoraproject.org |grep TYPE61 | sed
> "s/^.*TYPE61.*\\\#[0-9]* //" | grep -v ";" | sed "s/ //g" | xxd -r -p
> | gpg --import --dry-run
>
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for
> publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> This WGLC ends Fri 06-Mar-2015.
>
>
>
> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"):
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378
> for more details.)
>
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as DANE WG co-chair)
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf