Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND

Dave Crocker <> Wed, 11 January 2017 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BF7129F18 for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:47:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.792
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KphzFVecJ_ly for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 007FC129F03 for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v0BGmPPI024308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:48:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1484153305; bh=AE8vvhtkDNTQT6HOGmfhQZ2kAulLTp53svYN8d3NV9s=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VPBlB62QgObItTL1ODQDc3Fc+iPlDK3JdcLLrAE5kG3Re7TtXxsBNKN2tUkA+6d8S wr5HPfUWvO/hk7MlXW1JnjjPUF4axMXSBlXuuFAz6K9zAE2AGSTPA5Z9Jnow2y+1mA j+x1IRVYx5V/Ln/BljvsiZ6wXg4D/GA1ZD2gzHcc=
To: Kurt Andersen <>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
References: <> <> <> <>
From: Dave Crocker <>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:46:48 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [dbound] The Fate of DBOUND
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:47:04 -0000

On 11/16/2016 4:36 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
> What about publishing an experimental design spec along with the four
> drafts? That could put a framework around the entire process and perhaps
> avoid some of the challenges that SPFbis had when trying to move from
> experimental to standards track. The WG could become the manager of the
> experiment for a designated duration and responsible for collecting and
> publishing the results.

There might not be agreement about how to solve this topic (or topic/s/) 
but there seems to be agreement that it is an interesting and possibly 
important topic.  And there's been quite a bit of serious effort, here.

So marking that effort in the RFC archive makes sense to me, even if 
standards status isn't attached to any of it.


   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking