IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Fri, 27 January 2012 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F35A21F863C for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:29:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0-9FE4cqvwQi for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7288421F862B for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from /spool/local by e37.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <dc@ietf.org> from <narten@us.ibm.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:30 -0700
Received: from d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.177) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:14 -0700
Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C001FF0049 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q0RITDT0097480 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:13 -0700
Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q0RITCM9014282 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:12 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-76-135-189.mts.ibm.com [9.76.135.189]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q0RITBG5014131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:29:12 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id q0RIT9N7027486; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:29:09 -0500
Message-Id: <201201271829.q0RIT9N7027486@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E290D14D@dfweml503-mbx>
References: <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E290D14D@dfweml503-mbx>
Comments: In-reply-to AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com> message dated "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:23:51 +0000."
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:29:08 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 12012718-7408-0000-0000-000002367FFF
Cc: "dc@ietf.org" <dc@ietf.org>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@cisco.com>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net>, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>, "kreeger@cisco.com" <kreeger@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01
X-BeenThere: dc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Data Center Mailing List <dc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc>
List-Post: <mailto:dc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:29:33 -0000

> Thomas, No such beasts as PBB-V and PBB-M ;) I think you are
>  referring to SPBV and SPBM which have the properties you describe.

Indeed! Too many acronyms... Sigh. :-(

Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email