IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01

Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net> Fri, 27 January 2012 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@unbehagen.net>
X-Original-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB8E21F859E for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLKUSYmrUdyV for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E1921F8592 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so1062150ghb.31 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.165.1 with SMTP id d1mr12605185yhl.54.1327691913649; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] (c-67-161-144-217.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [67.161.144.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u39sm15204420yhe.5.2012.01.27.11.18.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:18:32 -0800 (PST)
References: <7AE6A4247B044C4ABE0A5B6BF427F8E290D14D@dfweml503-mbx> <201201271829.q0RIT9N7027486@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <201201271829.q0RIT9N7027486@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <8122B69C-6EE4-4EBB-88C5-2649ABDA5872@unbehagen.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405)
From: Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:18:28 -0700
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "dc@ietf.org" <dc@ietf.org>, AshwoodsmithPeter <Peter.AshwoodSmith@huawei.com>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@cisco.com>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>, "kreeger@cisco.com" <kreeger@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01
X-BeenThere: dc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Data Center Mailing List <dc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc>
List-Post: <mailto:dc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:18:34 -0000

Also, all implementations and deployments of SPB are SPBm, the scaling and ability to deal with Mac explosions help in the DC. 

--
Paul Unbehagen

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 27, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>> Thomas, No such beasts as PBB-V and PBB-M ;) I think you are
>> referring to SPBV and SPBM which have the properties you describe.
> 
> Indeed! Too many acronyms... Sigh. :-(
> 
> Thomas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dc mailing list
> dc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email