Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Fri, 27 January 2012 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3521F85EA for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBmTgJoJLioA for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F1E21F85D4 for <dc@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id ACY91165; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:49:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:47:27 -0800
Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.151]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:47:10 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Paul Unbehagen <paul@unbehagen.net>
Thread-Topic: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01
Thread-Index: Aczcic4dhzNCqBUxQSqOznX8P2avFQARvMcAABCCe8A=
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:47:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F632E181E2@dfweml505-mbx>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F632E17F2D@dfweml505-mbx> <C5CE8493-6543-4EB0-BCEB-99EEBA3FD59E@unbehagen.net>
In-Reply-To: <C5CE8493-6543-4EB0-BCEB-99EEBA3FD59E@unbehagen.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.97]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F632E181E2dfweml505mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "dc@ietf.org" <dc@ietf.org>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@cisco.com>, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>, "kreeger@cisco.com" <kreeger@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dc] comments and suggestions to draft-narten-nv03-overlay-problem-statment-01
X-BeenThere: dc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Data Center Mailing List <dc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc>
List-Post: <mailto:dc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:49:11 -0000

Paul,

See my comments below:



The limitation for PBB and VLAN should include that MAC addresses can’t be aggregated, therefore forwarding table can be very large for large data centers.

Disagree, this isn't what we see in live deployments. Since the Mac learning of the host stations only happens at the edge switches and the services are distributed across many edge switches the ISID service Mac table sizes don't end up being that large on any given node. Additionally the core never sees any macs but the nodes participating in the backbone from edge switch to edge switch.

[Linda] If PBB’s MAC-in-MAC Overlay encapsulation is done at the access switches in data center, then the core switches forwarding table won’t explode. However, if the Mac-in-Mac overlay encapsulation is performed by servers’ hypervisor, the switches’ forwarding table could explode if there are hundreds of thousands of servers in data center, which is getting more and more common in large data centers.

Linda