IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04: (with COMMENT)

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Wed, 25 October 2017 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34900137A70 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NhbDyrYfLTs for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED301377B3 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n5so30075283qke.11 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SmOwg/ATygnqXU8ZhN7ykYMP/mrpWH38dRqW0y0Pklw=; b=RDBzz99/Qg5LKwO6n7ohgeLcnN/FcADzxa7xYmueX9AMtSAMQcydmcj78lNBRRiyFo GtDaumWGwVuPESrs+Gjr5ukmJF1ZqXr4OpbjWdrfzzGBDYrWtbdT9X2AFEMb5mojGpkR bOvd7dXzJdrL9ig5qeW38791IcNjQ/7lT9/iqGj2M1azn+pz8X8tHyuvzTvi28BrpXvt TbRxLzc/A7dEFp8GT/PTWReSwKdg7GYJpbD3zYybIrnh8JSSmlncRJk7Y1yMRIWvOu/I ZG3N7EE+ccdHx5xz9VE6jzp7HRv7gY6z91ojqAYnamUYLkncKDS00w2Ogmfm6nkWcRP0 vuNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SmOwg/ATygnqXU8ZhN7ykYMP/mrpWH38dRqW0y0Pklw=; b=Kly/6UvxVVYGr07s3VrgPQ/M3i8PnqVJB4jE+KQJDNja7ou6NRNx9iZXHx2NDwddrz 5EhOysAVWkRwLH+9NWK1LMhrvcvHO2a1Xb3bE0gOmyi29KOzrVtj9ifbu7tg/coAy35m +0myJ9ch/0coYMH7F1y1Z3M8n6oV3zzSOIBlH1US8tg++Tviu96skVt2MvrJJrkxKbL7 SL9NZHKgN9/0hcsc/MVPFHKBWRz7+qH2CEJD5eNXK+4lP/R1CMY9n7Ok5PpRk8PBY8ZP 6E/8XjLt+IupL1qtPR00WKe7H/C3l3T2MeHFmWfDQi8p1qod+QvE5EbBvjJPsvrD76+q HV5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW7ZzKKxBFCtPurJVc8Htbwc6KNqwAUOAZh4OAMhpZA26Jy0TMu OLuDe2aCqdYi6qMyA+mWxCKIs6VH5QKghBqM9lwII7g0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TaTxxozwv2rx4q1Tzu3zO3Kv0zmuTrk81dQ3JGhjJKT3Vk/nGzW2DUbecodgwXR2Lzq0tLmC3uJBaydx2SWxY=
X-Received: by 10.55.165.213 with SMTP id o204mr2556877qke.313.1508932782150; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.28.3 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1827464.gt1Kil1zhX@kitterma-e6430>
References: <150649085207.24995.1867894975380491185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABuGu1pVBARKZBxVR=Sgkb_kB-CuPrHEPqUxZs57HpmABOpi9A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbKYuffPwyz=zQLQatKpb6d07gsGCJ4wFJLpfSfJavTjA@mail.gmail.com> <1827464.gt1Kil1zhX@kitterma-e6430>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 04:59:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfMSUQMtb7p_ioggnuFWVGp=bxtm6417dP-vjcegh-z1WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fd6dc786ed7055c5dcafc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/RKsW_w4JdsBFn8AelzxXCUNEUf8>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:59:46 -0000

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:
>
> You've convinced me "none" is not what we want.  I think that your
> hypothetical DKIM signature warrants a "permerror" and that's what we
> should
> use here.
>

As a report receiver, "permerror" is a much clearer signal than "fail" that
there's an error on the domain owner's end that requires fixing. I'm now
convinced and retract my earlier "it should be fail" comment.

-- 

[image: logo for sig file.png]

Bringing Trust to Email

Seth Blank | Director of Industry Initiatives
seth@valimail.com
+1-415-894-2724 <415-894-2724>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email