Adjacency index
"John A. Shriver" <jas@proteon.com> Fri, 28 August 1992 15:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03155; 28 Aug 92 11:06 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03151; 28 Aug 92 11:06 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08569; 28 Aug 92 11:07 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA01499; Fri, 28 Aug 92 08:07:12 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA09407; Fri, 28 Aug 92 07:58:46 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA09403; Fri, 28 Aug 92 07:58:44 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA00996; Fri, 28 Aug 92 07:58:38 -0700
Received: from sonny.proteon.com by monk.proteon.com (5.65/1.8)id AA28086; Fri, 28 Aug 92 10:57:34 -0400
Received: by sonny.proteon.com (3.2/SMI-3.2)id AA18909; Fri, 28 Aug 92 10:56:46 EDT
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 10:56:46 -0400
From: "John A. Shriver" <jas@proteon.com>
Message-Id: <9208281456.AA18909@sonny.proteon.com>
To: saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com
Cc: rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com, saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com, phiv-mib@pa.dec.com
In-Reply-To: saperia@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com's message of Fri, 28 Aug 92 09:55:32 -0400 <9208281355.AA10320@tcpjon.ogo.dec.com>
Subject: Adjacency index
Using a variable length name as an index? That sounds very painful to me. I'd really rather index by the circuit number. This is very consistent with the IP MIB indexing by interface number.
- Adjacency index saperia
- Adjacency index John A. Shriver
- Adjacency index John A. Shriver
- Re: Adjacency index Bob Stewart
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Adjacency index John A. Shriver
- Re: Adjacency index Bob Stewart
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index Art Berggreen
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index Bob Stewart
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index Debasis Dalapati
- Re: Adjacency index Debasis Dalapati
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index Art Berggreen
- Re: Adjacency index Debasis Dalapati
- Re: Adjacency index saperia
- Re: Adjacency index saperia