Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang

Hi Greg, all,

Good to see the discussion on active OAM on the list.

I think it is essentially a basic data plane consideration. You also 
referred to draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls. It seems that the data plane 
has to be sorted out first.

Of course, the YANG draft has to be then updated accordingly. I think 
that update could be done when the draft is with the WG, i.e., after WG 
adoption.

Thanks,
Janos

On 9/18/2018 9:16 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Janos, et. al,
> the mpls-detnet-header container is based on the solution described in
> draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls. Analysis of active SFC OAM in the
> proposed MPLS data plane solution in draft-mirsky-detnet-oam points to
> the potential problem as result the fact that OAM packet doesn't
> include d-CW. I believe that this question should be discussed and, if
> we agree on the problem statement, properly resolved. Until then, I do
> not support the adoption of the model that may not be capable to
> support active OAM.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:03 PM Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> This is start of a two week poll on making draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang-04
>> a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating
>> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
>> your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
>> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
>> document.
>>
>> The poll ends Oct 3.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> János and Lou
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> detnet mailing list
>> detnet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet