IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 18 September 2018 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA310130EE3; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JhumAy-6kqs; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7073D130EC6; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id r4-v6so2878433lff.12; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZAQ9Vd6WlLKDOXgMhEAkgjUNB/m2zXzyyPA8PwjZQoo=; b=lObJIx+7N6/dBvDqu0h0Qch8hegzdEWI8Y7X9oxuMO/8fbDu7hBoA3YHySvz1s3SaK 7wgrSNsUwcfvah7WDa/qAmt2V/j07kLWXo8yORU4X1g2XqrAVvOWij5HaIhDoj+JDtXF NNxzVLRjdnr215PhiH0Ll9pYK4HkRnyp8d46W1PSCvcST8sRyxTqmuEDOSRCk+QksmT4 86IUoAjBvF9DXhb0aZzWlxuqIIYvdbPwOI22HXrHwzp9W7/1YLNhWw3ghN+HbR4K+hlm bWDx0d8Q/0dNQUQpKuwWtEjvHE6HKfEk19eHqyAo4sEeNMd/lH6Pl5ar23slEEjWkxm7 gLwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZAQ9Vd6WlLKDOXgMhEAkgjUNB/m2zXzyyPA8PwjZQoo=; b=qGmjT4jSeDHmAT48j7H0lOGr8IFsXf48CrHLoOVDyIDp5Z4iu9giSfqkWRT2iLEpkY IZrYPhNbTAeOEJTfBMvB0cItpZ8yyXrFfMoV74hqlmhvSYxqpwJakXlgIpq9gfaq5iKU ftK5jLlfSTmvTbtyJfKxHL6SFgQqAhVma5WMLWXY8hBML0RVA08XfIzKMkA6DW7+HJdI AfptY1CtrDDd8Zu7TdDjiyG55f7g5w5XbnU1qhBfASamNvHBvvyKNOUurjQJ+laLsh1S ceKwsIap0NADCaRBubM8FEHN1BQn1drybw8E4jHysgdbOikwkY0qTgfvmsYNRz5cjvaN QNMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AlXEGZ7uwzGTDGWMk84NxetRunhDnvL4nzBf0zZsdOFfgpvUT8 utOZR9t/PakF5LAxX8zCbLq1BwbF4iIZAUPn8Kw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYoX0D8Dr43Vt9jjfc4ZsqX3RBHxVTgccChd4qmyRp0g4+HuiBTi4xoHLNQg81VqPEZDN9jfX4/bVPQX9BSReg=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:735d:: with SMTP id o90-v6mr3736373lfc.45.1537298206407; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <HE1PR0701MB24577436ECDA028E9750C1CCF21D0@HE1PR0701MB2457.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB24577436ECDA028E9750C1CCF21D0@HE1PR0701MB2457.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:16:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmV_W56Djp3uxaPniOvooCYjNPbxKVfiY5+KAeM9ZOXhfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: János Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
Cc: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/kuz8dAIe2N4ioXdLIgV8rTrsm_k>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:16:51 -0000

Hi Janos, et. al,
the mpls-detnet-header container is based on the solution described in
draft-ietf-detnet-dp-sol-mpls. Analysis of active SFC OAM in the
proposed MPLS data plane solution in draft-mirsky-detnet-oam points to
the potential problem as result the fact that OAM packet doesn't
include d-CW. I believe that this question should be discussed and, if
we agree on the problem statement, properly resolved. Until then, I do
not support the adoption of the model that may not be capable to
support active OAM.

Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:03 PM Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is start of a two week poll on making draft-geng-detnet-conf-yang-04
> a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating
> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
> your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
> document.
>
> The poll ends Oct 3.
>
> Thanks,
> János and Lou
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email