Re: [Detnet] IETF 116 DetNet Side Meeting Proposal

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

Oopps sorry, was too busy to read all emails now (monday deadline ;-).
Stopped after you're explantion this would be an informal side-meeting
because i thought those couldn't use WG IETF webex.

So, great you can offer the IETF webex. Please let's use it!

Cheers
    Toerless

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 12:02:06PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
> Toreless,
> 
> Is there a reason you don't want to take Janos up on his offer of the WG
> webex?
> 
> Lou
> 
> PS the rooms all come with AV speakerphones for remote participants...
> 
> On 3/11/2023 2:59 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > I will set up a webex after monday (draft deadline... busy) and
> > add to side meeting wiki. Also bringing the room speaker thingy...
> > 
> > Would be happy to hear folks who can only participate from remote to chime in that
> > this is needed, else we can of course also skip it (but not a lot of work).
> > 
> > Cheers
> >      Toerless
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:37:51PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> > > Hi Xuesong
> > > 
> > > Thanks for initiating this.  One process point - this is not an "official"
> > > WG meeting - That happens as part of the main meeting!
> > > 
> > > This is an informal meetup of those interesting in working on solutions to
> > > the enhanced dataplane requirements document - to take advantage of many of
> > > those individuals being in person at IETF 116.  I think it would be great
> > > for there to be remote participation, but I don't see this as a strict
> > > requirement for this informal meeting to be useful.  Clearly we want to have
> > > all who want to participate who can, but good discussion can still occur
> > > even with a more limited group.
> > > 
> > > Wider discussion can and should occur on the WG list. Keeping in mind that,
> > > and as always, WG decisions and consensus take place on the WG list.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for taking the lead on setting this up!
> > > Lou (as Co-chair)
> > > 
> > > On 3/7/2023 11:35 PM, Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) wrote:
> > > > Hi WG,
> > > > 
> > > > As discussed in the interim, we plan to have an official side meeting in
> > > > Yokohama. Considering the DetNet is in Thursday Session I, I have signed
> > > > a side meeting on 15:30-17:00 29^th March (Wednesday session III) in
> > > > wiki page (https://wiki.ietf.org/e/en/meeting/116/sidemeetings ) with
> > > > the name of “Latency Guarantee in Deterministic Networking”.  Please
> > > > check whether the time slot and the meeting name looks suitable to you.
> > > > 
> > > > Also, I notice that there are some interesting discussions in our
> > > > interim about whether DetNet will persue 100% bounded latency guarantee
> > > > and it seems that people tend to think the answer will be no. So I think
> > > > this may bring a lot of other existing IETF work into our view. So shall
> > > > we invite people from other WG to introduce the related work and discuss
> > > > their understanding of DetNet, for example: network slicing, L4S, etc. I
> > > > think that will also be very helpful for our further work.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW, it will be very helpful if chairs could help set up a call meeting
> > > > if people think the
> > > > 
> > > > Best
> > > > 
> > > > Xuesong
> > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > detnet mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
> > 
> 

-- 
---
[e-mail]