Re: [Detnet] IETF 116 DetNet Side Meeting Proposal

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

I will set up a webex after monday (draft deadline... busy) and
add to side meeting wiki. Also bringing the room speaker thingy...

Would be happy to hear folks who can only participate from remote to chime in that
this is needed, else we can of course also skip it (but not a lot of work).

Cheers
    Toerless

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:37:51PM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Xuesong
> 
> Thanks for initiating this.  One process point - this is not an "official"
> WG meeting - That happens as part of the main meeting!
> 
> This is an informal meetup of those interesting in working on solutions to
> the enhanced dataplane requirements document - to take advantage of many of
> those individuals being in person at IETF 116.  I think it would be great
> for there to be remote participation, but I don't see this as a strict
> requirement for this informal meeting to be useful.  Clearly we want to have
> all who want to participate who can, but good discussion can still occur
> even with a more limited group.
> 
> Wider discussion can and should occur on the WG list. Keeping in mind that,
> and as always, WG decisions and consensus take place on the WG list.
> 
> Thanks for taking the lead on setting this up!
> Lou (as Co-chair)
> 
> On 3/7/2023 11:35 PM, Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) wrote:
> > 
> > Hi WG,
> > 
> > As discussed in the interim, we plan to have an official side meeting in
> > Yokohama. Considering the DetNet is in Thursday Session I, I have signed
> > a side meeting on 15:30-17:00 29^th March (Wednesday session III) in
> > wiki page (https://wiki.ietf.org/e/en/meeting/116/sidemeetings ) with
> > the name of “Latency Guarantee in Deterministic Networking”.  Please
> > check whether the time slot and the meeting name looks suitable to you.
> > 
> > Also, I notice that there are some interesting discussions in our
> > interim about whether DetNet will persue 100% bounded latency guarantee
> > and it seems that people tend to think the answer will be no. So I think
> > this may bring a lot of other existing IETF work into our view. So shall
> > we invite people from other WG to introduce the related work and discuss
> > their understanding of DetNet, for example: network slicing, L4S, etc. I
> > think that will also be very helpful for our further work.
> > 
> > BTW, it will be very helpful if chairs could help set up a call meeting
> > if people think the
> > 
> > Best
> > 
> > Xuesong
> > 

> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet


-- 
---
[e-mail]