IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17

"Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com> Tue, 15 August 2017 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=14005b552f=eagros@dolby.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EB71321CB for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gebebqaqEkX3 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-000fd501.pphosted.com (mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com [67.231.152.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A9E132386 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000695.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v7FH8SuQ024790; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:28 -0700
Received: from dlb-xchpw03.dolby.net (dcd-outbound.dolby.com [67.216.187.124]) by mx0b-000fd501.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2c9yf3h15v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:28 -0700
Received: from DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net (10.233.7.3) by DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net (10.233.7.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:27 -0700
Received: from DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net ([10.103.9.186]) by DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net ([10.103.9.186]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:08:26 -0700
From: "Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com>
To: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
Thread-Index: AdMVRJPusQTOh1kOSRWyujOndyXvgwAi0zwHAAZDLSA=
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:08:26 +0000
Message-ID: <5eb767db5fec47afae208cd9fd45fb05@DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net>
References: <f58e48fbb58d4aca80dc53212361e793@DLB-XCHPW03.dolby.net> <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8CC181F@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8CC181F@dfwpml702-chm.exmail.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.207.133.62]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5eb767db5fec47afae208cd9fd45fb05DLBXCHPW03dolbynet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-15_13:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/rgAjrk87FBV83V_aTD985oH6Meg>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:08:33 -0000

Good question. Is anyone interested in contributing text for a network slicing use case?
Ethan.

From: Norman Finn [mailto:norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 7:08 AM
To: Grossman, Ethan A. <eagros@dolby.com>; DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17

There was a lot of mention of DetNet in the network slicing BOF.  Should we have that use case?

-- Norm
________________________________
From: detnet [detnet-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Grossman, Ethan A. [eagros@dolby.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:31 PM
To: DetNet WG
Subject: [Detnet] DetNet Use Cases additions - Deadline 10Sep17
Hi Folks,
The DetNet Use Cases draft 12 will expire in October, i.e. before IETF 100, so I plan to have an update before then. According to my notes, there are five items to address, which I enumerate below. If you are one of the people mentioned below, please reply to indicate your current suggestion for new text for the draft.

I expect such text to be in a form consistent with the existing use cases, however it could be plain text or a Word doc, i.e. it doesn't have to be in XML.

In several of the cases we have had some email exchanges regarding text wording - it is possible that I already have the latest text, but I would like for you to send me what you understand to be the latest, to make sure we are in sync.

1.       Diego Duovne: Mining Industry use case.
2.       Maik Seewald: "Comments on section: 3.1.1.2 Intra-Substation Process Bus Communications" and "for IEC 61850 installations only part 9-3 applies:"
3.       Hassan Halabian: 5G Packet Fronthaul
4.       Daniel Huang: Blockchain use case
5.       Xavier Vilajosana: Wind Farm use case

If anyone else has any suggestions or comments, or if I somehow lost track of your request and didn't list it below, please reply.

Please send your replies for each of these potential additions by September 10, 2017 so that I have time to review and integrate.

Thanks,
Ethan.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email