IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)

"Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2903A10C7; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:56:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm5b3UL18smS; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD0F3A0C87; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id u12so1723770ilv.3; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:56:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5nXdWiF5ZvuIZH926H7XAZ/SmSSU+p5/3lbx3aI2NzM=; b=em6KkLVmkA+03uTUkWIa8Re0oOJWTC05wa9EmNi4XRuWSKW2gMcC6sXHGRE/f7YKkL Vamt71QKzjopyCfwOJNgwzqQEcshe/0cRGwws11ulfduJCb+JUYYhoth9IktKjwpXntm nE1jQbT/CzglGtx4QUYB8pDYwjZ0CmptLFQKR6Rjsuhpi6BTew79/EoTyqSlWK6ef0gB rVVu1zeudSpnXZOIlGbuoruGcHNyh3heXGGfl0R2it8E1gSuo0OCYCrhuUada6wHAgGw r/1LY03SqGpgZmF2GT+a6y+W1oLKfSP4xIqXtlvaAgim3e/QmRz6WsyTxCu5XnD0pvbS 0Ldw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5nXdWiF5ZvuIZH926H7XAZ/SmSSU+p5/3lbx3aI2NzM=; b=GlMB2lxhU+Rcy3HN26xCKGFmmrLb9Xt1QpFYp0Obt5pdroT4wqkDgYsY3jQ+YnN1BO sAct1yjifw6DmiIZvQK3SNr0YGR1OzBQazxxL/Q0msY7IJD9PGbgYJ9bQl4rV0KXZPBF wZJXKwekfONKx9dzRFnW31ONZ+CMm6XALOA55RGOepSnYv6jDNCgwjLkQ0aKrfUV3RT4 rjdux+w0q66r2vA6RHQeQVPZECWupJO528FhQFrUfYWSjIinzLVA+N9DcKHxS0qy5/vd VzDCdK6aEJjt7i8uZpUf278OgVjszLeiO/rFT5NLXLXtN58HRYZLqPwwJZTxWdmU+Olt ZHug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YkCjvlefSYUb72KzbuTSqmxXO7YrMWFnJdqXpN2qHlH5bi76S Lr6SR05IO3cVlmvG7hfq/gzENv08xYIjlxQIvvg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyU4cqX6fe8eJyRrhDhObftRXTZM2Xck3QQIFaUijtkm/vmBF445Qee5ETBmFa11hsp2wZm2fFw5wZReZZlCE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c0d0:: with SMTP id t16mr2370408ilf.21.1609898165660; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:56:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160820711541.15777.13816639667390977378@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160820711541.15777.13816639667390977378@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:55:53 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGGiuEYmp_q-3vitMBUOVjCBMzSfUpYqDk3_e3LF2Uwdm3Nc7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, volz@cisco.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000049f13c05b831a0fb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2973bOEWSbqgoUc5a1lsdyZTS3Y>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 01:56:08 -0000

09:53.hk S8 Jan. 06 2021



Good Day,



Without ISP dhcp-pd supportable affirmation, Relay won't be considered as
one function switch has for  since Apr. 2014 offering dhcpv6 to today .


Sincerely
Li HUANG

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020, 20:12 Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support Ben's and Erik's question as to the standard of this document.
> It
> isn't immediately obvious to me why this is standard track and perhaps BCP
> or
> Informational might be a better classification.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email