[dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 December 2020 12:11 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, volz@cisco.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160820711541.15777.13816639667390977378@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 04:11:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/M3BYvcgmX-Oo04mJrdFTmI3zwlI>
Subject: [dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Ben's and Erik's question as to the standard of this document.  It
isn't immediately obvious to me why this is standard track and perhaps BCP or
Informational might be a better classification.

[dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [dhcwg] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft… Ms. Li HUANG