IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DUID+IAID

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 30 March 2012 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118F521F8600 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vs2W5Flg2rC4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E3221F87B9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT3V8gnSqIlvtxC+T/lOI9ucgyTS5aytI@postini.com; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:30 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48D21B8237 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9986190064; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:27:29 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, "A. Gregory Rabil" <greg.rabil@jagornet.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] DUID+IAID
Thread-Index: AQHNDk7f4FgtkXLiwESgwgUDJGkpD5aCkfCb
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:27:29 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307472D478A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: Your message of Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:17:05 EDT. <CAAed6vsuc5AoJ-pmdu-CYLzJ4jEtSUkxYy1aLTJbkoRiEjUQ9A@mail.gmail.com> , <201203300826.q2U8Qx51078004@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201203300826.q2U8Qx51078004@givry.fdupont.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DUID+IAID
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:27:33 -0000

> I raise here a silly but real concern: the common assumption
> a MAC address is unique to a physical interface is *false*:

Right, that's why we don't want to use it as an identifier.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email