IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 06 July 2012 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22E411E809A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVNUhVPLYtuN for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6965111E8095 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=volz@cisco.com; l=657; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1341545015; x=1342754615; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MPxl5GFTOJ6gNt1nkkpHPyvwkgM6/RCjQmqhT6YPiGE=; b=MCSTaOekTQzV9enNVAXXrg4ltd3cJ76UAgpYfU7NT6KrRGjROnoOpyr6 H9tCcG0vuW8UUaDTcOo95QucUE1hn78JqpN0+Vtn5dbpR5XrwJIsLb6jm v9pbBJD5dWTa5UIjKoUfIszTMC6hNeVeEoRd9xjl7RmPZW/90JecYhYa4 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAHtZ9k+tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABFtzaBB4IZAQEEEgEnNAsQAgEIIhQQMiUBAQQODRqHaZl3oBuQf2ADo1SBZoJf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,535,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="99252486"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2012 03:23:35 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q663NZGi013431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 03:23:35 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.177]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:23:35 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
Thread-Index: Ac06QOfpB+YCOuC4SFifU+LuLN2whwAIIOBACDEp/UA=
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:23:34 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E01C91F@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890C7B57AC@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com><20120525063747.GD20816@shell-too.nominum.com> <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890C7B58E1@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890C7B58E1@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.247.219]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19022.000
x-tm-as-result: No--33.374300-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:23:24 -0000

Hi:

I was reviewing the comments related to this draft on the mailing list to see about updating the draft and re-submitting it.

However, after a review of the comments and draft, I don't see anything that I feel needs to change.

For those that commented on the draft, do you agree or is there something I missed that needs to be updated/clarified in the draft?

For those have not (yet) commented, comments are appreciated.

Ole and I would like to advance this draft (to DHC working group last call), so please comment as to whether you feel edits are necessary or whether you feel it is OK as is.

Thanks much!

- Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email