IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Mon, 01 October 2012 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D5D21F8555 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pXjYt3foaoNJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8F521F8554 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1349059732; x=1350269332; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nKMGoYZQZs3i510pkrIZwgSLMLnsoYGvz13B+UoedNE=; b=csSxr7Hkp2qVqXbP/TtDRUBfm/w8FU1yBi58ldvWWRWqSU7CPiOBfdHM NDUkTj5e+tdGpMYVdZv5WVYQDY4LA+tUEa1qMcW6nPv2RyKg00V0AXjZE edmc8K+ONQwKWtkJ/Z2OU6Ej9zJDpB9deqKWHBdmL62hdFehSOwmfjsUH w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAEkEaVCtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFvjmBCIIgAQEBBAEBAQ8BCh00FwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAgQBEggah2MLmjafFgSLH4VrYAOkK4FpgmeCFw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,514,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="126964891"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2012 02:48:51 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q912mpnr032022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 02:48:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.235]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:48:51 -0500
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
Thread-Index: AQHNlrARAq1IuhHT2UasbuE4rMIyj5ej0M6g
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 02:48:51 +0000
Message-ID: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB1BD3A001@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <EBDD0AE4-93C6-44F1-9BE0-7B7BE5EC2173@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EBDD0AE4-93C6-44F1-9BE0-7B7BE5EC2173@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.82.82]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19222.004
x-tm-as-result: No--43.641700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 02:49:10 -0000

I read this I.D and I think it's a useful work to do. I am in favor of adopting this document as WG document.

Thanks,
Gaurav 

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:15 AM
To: dhc WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01

I'd like the working group to work on this document.   The point of the document is to provide a mechanism whereby DHCP requesting routers can indicate their preference to the DHCP delegating router as to how the reverse zone for a delegated prefix should be handled, and to provide a mechanism whereby the delegating router can communicate back to the requesting router the mechanism that was chosen.

John will be evaluating consensus, since I'm the author of the draft.   He will evaluate consensus some time after October 2.   If you are in favor of adopting this draft, please say so on the mailing list.   If you think it's a bad idea, please say so on the list.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email