IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01

"Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)" <pjhingra@cisco.com> Thu, 20 September 2012 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pjhingra@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B701321F867E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wez+URU+lTv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65C221F867B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1138; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1348123161; x=1349332761; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=PdpsoVDOKqW4SB5ulBvul9D5xDUBMy1tl4hxDG1cAVg=; b=hNLeLAYp673nUZEGX3toKWKcbFRjuWnDekQyzSTm/7GdNuV3ODtxqeQ7 0svlKT71Z65RJGrzu2Gknmys1EQrdfJKup9q8NW1Scfwjoihmchkohsjr cWtxC4+oQLAPO46ka+IGL8IlEwg5Q2WTUaqOuLThim9TuUOzh1QZ6wTLP I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAD+5WlCtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABFvRSBCIIgAQEBBAEBAQ8BCh00FwQCAQgRBAEBCxQJBycLFAkIAgQBEggah2ELmX6gCgSLHIVhYAOkHIFpgmaCFw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,453,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="123450350"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2012 06:39:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8K6dKgD018044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:39:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.3]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:39:19 -0500
From: "Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)" <pjhingra@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
Thread-Index: AQHNlrARAq1IuhHT2UasbuE4rMIyj5eSr/JA
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:39:19 +0000
Message-ID: <F567B77E0728694BB6716DB3C9000B6B04B6A927@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <EBDD0AE4-93C6-44F1-9BE0-7B7BE5EC2173@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EBDD0AE4-93C6-44F1-9BE0-7B7BE5EC2173@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.78.28]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19194.004
x-tm-as-result: No--42.859500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:39:21 -0000

I support this document.

-
Regards,
Prashant Jhingran



-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:15 AM
To: dhc WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-lemon-dhc-pd-01

I'd like the working group to work on this document.   The point of the document is to provide a mechanism whereby DHCP requesting routers can indicate their preference to the DHCP delegating router as to how the reverse zone for a delegated prefix should be handled, and to provide a mechanism whereby the delegating router can communicate back to the requesting router the mechanism that was chosen.

John will be evaluating consensus, since I'm the author of the draft.   He will evaluate consensus some time after October 2.   If you are in favor of adopting this draft, please say so on the mailing list.   If you think it's a bad idea, please say so on the list.

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email