Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 19:14 UTC

From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
CC: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "davidmiles@google.com" <davidmiles@google.com>, "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>, "James.Bristow@swisscom.com" <James.Bristow@swisscom.com>, "roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it" <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "niels@qacafe.com" <niels@qacafe.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
Thread-Index: AQHStVDWuuiX81czlkCrNygpnBjILKHMuVCAgABeRgA=
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:14:04 +0000
Message-ID: <3C90BC64-08D9-432E-B16E-0A3C59ADFCE1@kaloom.com>
References: <20170414185617.0DC8FB813F0@rfc-editor.org> <1BDC18F7-878D-4B77-A43E-6B87204C77F3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BDC18F7-878D-4B77-A43E-6B87204C77F3@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1AE1B534CFC58543BF979E9BE9E0E11A@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Apr 2017 19:14:04.7812 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YQXPR01MB0389
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Mk9N2a_Dfi6kRjjgBJHjDOR2Cbg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:34:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:14:17 -0000

Hi Bernie,
  I will try to figure out how to do the IANA update. I will hold onto the erratum until then.

Thanks
Suresh

> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:36 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> This erratum is verified. Please update it to reflect that is verified.
> 
> We can then notify IANA to have the table corrected.
> 
> - Bernie Volz
> 
> On 4/14/17, 2:56 PM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
>    The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6704,
>    "Forcerenew Nonce Authentication".
> 
>    --------------------------------------
>    You may review the report below and at:
>    http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6704&eid=4995
> 
>    --------------------------------------
>    Type: Technical
>    Reported by: Niels Widger <niels@qacafe.com>
> 
>    Section: 4
> 
>    Original Text
>    -------------
>       IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>       registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>       http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
> 
>       Tag: 145
> 
>       Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
> 
>       Data length: 1
> 
>       Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
> 
>       Reference: this document
> 
>    Corrected Text
>    --------------
>       IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>       registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>       http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
> 
>       Tag: 145
> 
>       Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
> 
>       Data length: n
> 
>       Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
> 
>       Reference: this document
> 
>    Notes
>    -----
>    RFC 6704 Section 3.1.1 states that the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option is variable length and contains a list of algorithm types:
> 
>    The FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option contains code 145, length n, and
>       a sequence of algorithms the client supports:
> 
>                 Code   Len   Algorithms
>                +-----+-----+----+----+----+
>                | 145 |  n  | A1 | A2 | A3 | ....
>                +-----+-----+----+----+----+
> 
>                     Figure 1: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE Option
> 
>    Instructions:
>    -------------
>    This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>    use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>    rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>    can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
>    --------------------------------------
>    RFC6704 (draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-07)
>    --------------------------------------
>    Title               : Forcerenew Nonce Authentication
>    Publication Date    : August 2012
>    Author(s)           : D. Miles, W. Dec, J. Bristow, R. Maglione
>    Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>    Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
>    Area                : Internet
>    Stream              : IETF
>    Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
>

Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (… Bernie Volz (volz)
[dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995) RFC Errata System
Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (… Bernie Volz (volz)
Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (… Megan Ferguson