IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA8B1AE137 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:54:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiJUB-CKacuG for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABD1AE06E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:54:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1780; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384887263; x=1386096863; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=TVuOdKaggXIRnGapkBYotIt7kHmP5C0A93M8KVm9U2I=; b=m5wwNusydRnFTAhBcNMqB5BvQXMrbvjSpVQmh198jmER5iq4audio6nv JjqQcReSgQ2Nf8KwILVDKcwy/i6+UbI2K169kpeN7szFSiEI1hRpYU4Hl Lpk7cO1PxRuU/daZHqRBtPEADogulKBdZglmTP1nMfwju67gEGh/m416D o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAFqzi1KtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC78+gSEWdIIlAQEBAwEdHT8FBwQCAQgRBAEBAQoUBQsyHQgBAQQBDQUIh3MGv1QXjyYxBwaDGoESA6ofgWqBPoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,730,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="691208"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 18:54:23 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAJIsNqr008378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:54:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.192]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:54:22 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013
Thread-Index: Ac7e9nJH09KfY3gLTLmf3uiXHP4jdgGXyPUkAAyaWIAAACT0gAAMFyvQ
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:54:22 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD9D851@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89A8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <28184790-4053-4272-BDE5-E3E9393193E7@nominum.com> <FC352FE2-8739-4914-9069-00CB3D7CFFB7@nominum.com> <5D669F43-F675-445C-AE7B-939D4FB35C20@cisco.com> <5DAC4E26-08B7-4CCC-BA69-C29A7B98BD6A@nominum.com> <32816243-BA33-4CB3-A802-0BF7CF2F8161@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <32816243-BA33-4CB3-A802-0BF7CF2F8161@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.65.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:54:31 -0000

IMHO, I think two (separate v4 and v6) drafts would be better. Much less room for confusion. But, I'll let the authors and WG decide which they'd prefer.

(Also, I suspect it is less work as the drafts already exists :).)

I think if there is interest in the v4, Kim should republish the expired v4 draft. We can then start a WG call for adoption on that.

We the WG adopts both, we can then figure out whether one or two drafts are better. If the WG decides to only go forward with V6 (as appeared to be the inform indication during the WG), then we have nothing further to discuss on this issue.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Kinnear (kkinnear) 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:37 PM
To: Ted Lemon
Cc: Kim Kinnear (kkinnear); Mathias Samuelson; dhcwg@ietf.org; Bernie Volz (volz)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Ends November 25, 2013


I think it would *mostly* be the same.  The underlying bulk leasequery support is similar (though not identical), and I think we'd end up with two sections at one point -- one for deltas to v4 bulk leasequery, and one for deltas to v6 bulk leasequery.  But other than that, I think it would mostly be a case of v4/v6 options throughout -- which we already do all the time these days.  So, yes, I think it would mostly be the same.

Cheers -- Kim

On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:

> On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Any preferences from either Ted or Mathias (or anyone
>> else) on this question? I probably lean toward the combined draft 
>> myself.
> 
> If the text would mostly be the same, one draft seems better than two.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email