[dhcwg] draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 adoption call successful

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Tue, 03 December 2013 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F8D1AE17E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:35:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5NFbrSAUmrQA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4812C1A8032 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so14128210wes.15 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:35:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYtAIEknAFNSzBOfXbuK5G8ChciD6mp7G8VLignq7+c=; b=anIT8Vgtc+mzi9pZpXnchgCBDH0QcGeBq6P81AgmP6Qzi2OPAc9eHtmDRpavVld1wH 2L12541b8+gGz9Ki11bmwZ49kbqCRvEmrb4K71JNfvP9DQ3XrzWOI4ychgtf6Xjuy06q q54HnwU7zBBSEe5SzKyppvfsr8UCdUkBDA0xNOVJjNsaJV5tGqKU3YGLCanBXjrKc0S6 MLq63o9yctbZZC44ZmnIENPkikNZFjEvWCzVQ0iBAHeDx8TfY4oFHkSykjIHu5QZmnOW SXo6/FFs/F/Tc6FqilAqrSeVSv5K4U2NF/onYueX0azw/d8VVxCIx+s348JMvP2MQbfZ RFeg==
X-Received: by 10.180.10.135 with SMTP id i7mr3911598wib.1.1386095713053; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:6061:0:f66d:4ff:fe96:58f2? ([2001:470:6061:0:f66d:4ff:fe96:58f2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn2sm7857818wid.1.2013.12.03.10.35.11 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529E244D.3030308@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:34:53 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89A8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89A8C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20131203193453736
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 adoption call successful
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:35:18 -0000

On 11.11.2013 17:03, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is indeed WG
> consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG item. Please state whether or not
> you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not
> in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This
> adoption call will complete on November 25, 2013.
Sorry for a slight delay regarding this summary. I was on vacation last
week. Since Bernie and authors of that drafts work for the same company,
it is better for me to gauge the consensus.

Luckily, that was a very easy thing to do. There's very clear support
for adopting this work without any objections raised, so the adoption
call is successful. Authors, please upload your draft as WG
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00.

There were several voices raised regarding v4 active leasequery.
Together with Bernie we decided that if authors want to pursue v4 active
leasequery, they can do so using separate draft. Although DHCPv4 work is
technically outside of our charter, we asked for permission our
responsible AD if it would be ok to adopt it and got Ted's permission.
IIRC there was v4 active leasequery draft, but it expired. I think
reviving it and then doing adoption call would be the easiest way to
move forward.

On a practical note, having 2 drafts is easier to handle than one, for
multiple reasons. First, the text would be unnecessarily bloated ("in v4
use this, in v6 use that" in many places). Second, v4 has much less
enthusiastic support in the WG, so it is less likely that it will
conclude the standardization path. Third, having 2 drafts is much easier
to gauge consensus on separate drafts. Finally, some implementors are
interested in v6 only, so forcing them the deal with the v4 text is
unnecessary.

Tomek