IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] [radext] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 08 April 2013 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C021F9421; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4A06-DN487qa; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og127.obsmtp.com (exprod7og127.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A183321F9415; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob127.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUWLlSN/vkFvJzAYM3JbzHv3BiKj1rOGg@postini.com; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:42:00 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CB3108394; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C80190061; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:42:00 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] [radext] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10
Thread-Index: AQHONCshVSG79PrhReiNj3Ln9NlMtJjM2WGAgAAS14A=
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:41:59 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775138825@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <CAC8SSWtBMyDgShEDofyUjgcBiQ_ttY_DUbDNHnhhnf531+9XXA@mail.gmail.com> <FB413294-CF61-4AD9-AF26-41EC8A30DF37@gmail.com> <5162d5aa.0794420a.2f19.fffff597@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <5162d5aa.0794420a.2f19.fffff597@mx.google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775138825mbx01winnominum_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<radext@ietf.org>" <radext@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [radext] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-10
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:42:01 -0000

On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com<mailto:leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>> wrote:
Jouni - it is possible in future when new attributes get added to registry server silently discarding attributes may lead to a situation where the server fails to provide enough information back to relay.

Also, having the server reflect the option back is easy; having it make changes to the option is actually a protocol update, and probably not a good idea.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email