IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DC021E80C1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZ8nMoqxs2OZ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306E611E80F6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id p10so1383020pdj.23 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=4O3PXenc5rKUETlaNVO49e3m+xX/ATeF7CFTueV0OU4=; b=szlqnG16MSFGJXO0jiaQZ+uxGUeaIwJ7D5dp/UU2wHm8f/0taKfMIsjIB0rwhpXN+3 ikeJhx6X/IEGuEBL9LRUkq9xl/9XHo6aAmIaCKn2XqRwQ5+DJPvJUu7S2eemqqnxz6Yw ZowSMgWGNPhiKrxxqydYplYuhDeYJMpVAV9fj3a3o8XwEsdwvO/eirCUjcNvpBEuHLtl BQMI5ZOYfrvXhdtarlBFlrBfCqZrzUKgpETwltdtAKQk+1PNHPIi89zI27JWkQE29anQ 9gAXfYdPPii4lmMcqieMEA5RpTC0SC0gU1XDSDaCMKifawbx2DQuJGh+GLP/wdpRyGBj +y+Q==
X-Received: by 10.68.129.130 with SMTP id nw2mr33145197pbb.88.1384217848887; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([59.64.255.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm29336942pbu.38.2013.11.11.16.57.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-3-36231374"
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:57:20 +0800
Message-Id: <CB9041EE-EE19-4418-B6CA-49C67BB2CB57@gmail.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD20B47@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:57:30 -0000

Dear all,

I think this work is useful for securing the communication between the client and the server. I support the adoption.


Best Regards,
Qi


On 2013-11-11, at 下午11:54, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:

> Reminder that this call ends today – so far, we have had limited responses in favor of adopting this work.
>  
> If you support this work and would like to see it advance, please let us know ASAP. You can also review the slides presented in Vancouver athttp://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-dhc-5.ppt.
>  
> There was some discussion at the Vancouver session regarding the size of messages containing certificates and a suggestion to consider URIs as well as to look at IKE and how it handles some of these issues. However, these are not necessarily reasons to delay adoption.
>  
> -          Bernie
>  
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11:31 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
>  
> Hi all:
>  
> The author has requested a call for adoption by the WG for draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02. (This document “replaces” http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07 as that document went to the IESG – see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6/ for more details. The new document is very different so please read it.)
>  
> This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on November 11, 2013 – after the IETF meeting as it will likely be on the DHC WG agenda.
>  
> The HTML version of the document can be viewed at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6.
>  
> Regards,
> Tomek & Bernie
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email