IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 11 November 2013 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE0011E8193 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZkWcAFhVPnw for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8005B11E8107 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoEIsmgBs5xSx5sN1MZo0MO0Q19rCrvd@postini.com; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:22 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B8D1B82CE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49CF19005D; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:41:21 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
Thread-Index: Ac7K6RYO6IlqgYnCS8a24Ug8i2UzUgUDGT1QABKbRIA=
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:41:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7043C95F-D3C0-4999-A489-A50508E2E799@nominum.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD20B47@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <BFD0FAA3F6946048A4F337CA36D9B6C1@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:41:30 -0000

On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> Reminder that this call ends today – so far, we have had limited responses in favor of adopting this work.

Wearing my DHCP geek hat, not my AD hat, this draft is quite important because it provides a credible solution to the problem of providing authentication for DHCP messages.   The working group already completed and requested publication on a draft to which this one is quite similar; it stalled in the IESG because of an issue unrelated to the main focus of the draft, and this draft has been advanced to avoid that issue.   So I fully support adopting this draft and completing it.

Wearing my AD hat, I realize that the draft is a bit difficult, and that reviewing it is rough going because of all the non-DHCP technical detail.   However, I think the draft is important.   I am fairly sure I can get some cross-area reviewers for this draft if we have trouble getting enough review in the working group.   Please don't hesitate to ask if you need my help with this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email