Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01

Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487F621E80A0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aA8MYfiQx0zm for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE22621E8042 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFM54500; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:32:36 -0700
Received: from SZXEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.95) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:32:16 -0700
Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by szxeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.95]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:32:30 +0800
From: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
To: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Fwd: Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
Thread-Index: AQHNHLKyKRxtiNiTRUqW+ZigiZQ9+paqMt17gAAlB0I=
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:32:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D5B918C6-24B4-42E2-82FE-43BAABAE2135@mimectl>
References: <F7BE5872-FD07-40CD-9F6C-3F21932410C9@nominum.com>, <A6860A00-7B10-4992-AFD4-363AC1BAB525@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <A6860A00-7B10-4992-AFD4-363AC1BAB525@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.70]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D5B918C624B442E282FE43BAABAE2135mimectl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0000

Though the design in this document looks very complicated, the solution for the DHCPv6 failover or server redundancy sounds very important for the industry. I am interested to see the progress of this document officially in the WG, and +1 for the adoption as WG item.





Best Regards,

Leaf



________________________________
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Ted Lemon [Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 23:56
To: DHC WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01

Just a reminder, we will determine consensus to adopt this draft on the 24th of April.   If you want to see it adopted, and haven't said so already, please do.   If you don't think the wg should work on it and haven't said so, please do.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
Date: April 10, 2012 10:13:56 AM EDT
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com<mailto:tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>>
Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>>

On Apr 8, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com<mailto:tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>> wrote:
I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.

Please consider Tomek's request an official call for adoption.    If you are in favor of adopting this as a working group work item, please say so.   If you are against, please say so.

We will evaluate consensus to adopt this draft as a working group work item on April 24.