Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01

I would like to see this adopted as a work item of the DHC WG.

I'm always uncertain as to whether to chime in on these things
when I'm a co-author of a draft, but I think I was told that
doing so is a good idea.

Regards -- Kim

On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:

> Just a reminder, we will determine consensus to adopt this draft on the 24th of April.   If you want to see it adopted, and haven't said so already, please do.   If you don't think the wg should work on it and haven't said so, please do.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
>> Date: April 10, 2012 10:13:56 AM EDT
>> To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
>> Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
>> 
>> On Apr 8, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.
>> 
>> Please consider Tomek's request an official call for adoption.    If you are in favor of adopting this as a working group work item, please say so.   If you are against, please say so.
>> 
>> We will evaluate consensus to adopt this draft as a working group work item on April 24.  
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg