Re: [dhcwg] Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202AB11E80BB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+K288DFq+Hs for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og118.obsmtp.com (exprod7og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CE511E80B6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob118.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5dJlFsiSsNElAhESplPS+YFmbhK3O+G@postini.com; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:17 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D6B1B84EB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB0C190065 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:47:16 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
Thread-Index: AQHNFdUOdLCpCRiXV0yWYUk8x9pa75aUkgMAgBaxmoA=
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:47:16 +0000
Message-ID: <30932C2D-BA5F-4F90-8E14-B4EFFB7562C5@nominum.com>
References: <20120312204156.30819.94209.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F820DE1.9090907@gmail.com> <F7BE5872-FD07-40CD-9F6C-3F21932410C9@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <F7BE5872-FD07-40CD-9F6C-3F21932410C9@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_30932C2DBA5F4F908E14B4EFFB7562C5nominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Requesting adoption of draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:47:18 -0000

On Apr 10, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>> wrote:
On Apr 8, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com<mailto:tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>> wrote:
I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.

Please consider Tomek's request an official call for adoption.    If you are in favor of adopting this as a working group work item, please say so.   If you are against, please say so.

We will evaluate consensus to adopt this draft as a working group work item on April 24.

We had seven people speak in favor of adopting this work, and none against, so the working group consensus is to adopt.   Tomasz, when you're ready, please submit an official working group -00 version of the document.

Thanks!