[dhcwg] Re: [Mip6] [Updated] DHCP Option for Home Information Discovery inMIPv6

Alper Yegin wrote:
> Vijay,
> 
> As far as I remember you were the only one who didn't give up on pushing for
> integration. 

I think you remember wrong.

It'd only be a circular discussion if I had repeated the
> reasons for not bundling a bunch of protocol extensions in a single
> document. 

let the MIP6 WG hear the arguments again, since we couldn't
reach a conclusion in the design team.

> But I hope this data point helps: WiMAX Forum NWG architecture is using
> draft-jang. 

in what context and how are they planning to use it? the
WiMAX forum NWG can still use the DHCP options wherever
they are defined.

Vijay

> 
> Alper
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com]
>>Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:17 PM
>>To: Heejin Jang
>>Cc: mip6@ietf.org; dhcwg@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [Mip6] [Updated] DHCP Option for Home Information Discovery
>>inMIPv6
>>
>>Heejin Jang wrote:
>>
>>>Hello folks,
>>>We posted an I-D that proposes new DHCP Options for Home Information
>>>Discovery in MIPv6.
>>>
>>>Kindly note that the previous version of this draft is
>>>"draft-jang-dhc-haopt-02.txt" but the name is slightly changed into
>>>"draft-jang-mip6-hiopt-00.txt" while keeping almost the same contents.
>>>
>>>The drafts referencing this draft such as
>>>draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split-02.txt and
>>>draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-01.txt need to be revised
>>>accordingly.
>>>
>>>We would appreciate to hear your comments.
>>
>>when this draft was discussed in the MIP6 bootstrapping
>>design team, many people wanted to integrate the two DHCP
>>options into
>>draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated-dhc-01.txt.
>>this was mainly because the options defined in the document
>>have limited applicability beyond the integrated scenario
>>solution document. the only other mechanism is to manually
>>configure the DHCP servers in the visited link with
>>information like home agent address, home address and home
>>prefix. this is a bad idea.
>>
>>there was some opposition and we never reached an agreement.
>>
>>so I suggest including these options into the integrated
>>scenario solution document for these options to get
>>standardized quickly.
>>
>>Vijay
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Mip6 mailing list
>>Mip6@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg