Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxyserver-opt-00

[Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>]

I have a bunch of suggested changes to this draft, which fall into 
three categories:

1. A single change to the protocol itself.
2. Editorial changes - I think there was some extra text in this draft 
explaining proxy servers that isn't needed, and generate questions 
during the IESG review, so I'm suggesting that it be deleted.
3. Copyediting.   There were some minor spelling and grammatical errors.

The change to the protocol is that it currently specifies an 
encapsulation of suboptions, like option 82, but allows for the 
appearance of multiple suboptions, which is different than the behavior 
specified for handling options in RFC3396.   This is not a huge 
problem, but it probably requires additional code in DHCP servers and 
clients that isn't necessary, so I'd suggest changing it so that if you 
want to specify multiple proxy servers for the same protocol, you 
should just list more than one IP address/port tuple in the suboption 
for that protocol.

I've enclosed a diff for all the changes.