Re: [dhcwg] draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03

Richard Pruss <ric@cisco.com> Sun, 27 July 2008 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dhcwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87713A683D; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA46B3A683D for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jd2EgFB0qOwS for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EEA3A67EA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,259,1215388800"; d="scan'208";a="132189842"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2008 11:47:07 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6RBl7Xu024016; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:07 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6RBl7sL016735; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:47:07 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:07 -0700
Received: from [172.16.4.199] ([10.21.115.188]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:47:06 -0700
Message-Id: <52CF1BCD-9BEF-4A01-869B-F20A2C72B4C6@cisco.com>
From: Richard Pruss <ric@cisco.com>
To: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080727091906.GN1338@steelhead.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:47:04 +0100
References: <7EF5D845-4CA3-4100-AC40-5D760F8FCB40@cisco.com> <20080727091906.GN1338@steelhead.localdomain>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2008 11:47:06.0743 (UTC) FILETIME=[7EB1F870:01C8EFDE]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2908; t=1217159227; x=1218023227; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ric@cisco.com; z=From:=20Richard=20Pruss=20<ric@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dhcwg]=20draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03 |Sender:=20; bh=1JDFnBFMy40PXZzmyIj4dw21hQLRJ0viffrDdPmy+1c=; b=ISJ6b7mU3vqatJYzMIyv2EI7DEJXLxSdTcQCuSlYBHEljb5eoro18pv0u9 zo9qfNyRlezKYiYJ6GSG6YCYLAavDXLIro1RK9c9W1F8757X+8MDVw21MX3t 9H5xbIFS9d;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=ric@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks for your comments,

On 27/07/2008, at 10:19 AM, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:

> I have a couple of comments on new dhcp-auth I-D.
>
> - It still does not seem to address the issue of the difference in
> retransmission directions.  Especially I am not sure how dhcp-auth
> works when EAP-Success/Failure gets lost.
>
> - Comment on fragmentation.  The current draft says that there is over
> 200-octet space available more than the EAP MTU of 1020 octets.
> However, I am not sure that if over 200-octet space is really
> sufficient for 1500-octet MTU considering that DHCP relay agent
> information option can be inserted by DHCP relay agent as well as
> there can be 'shim' layers below IP.

Relay's typically add only port information so I think we can be quiet  
safe with our 200 bytes
also considering the real world EAP packet sizes.

- Ric


>
>
> - DHCP EAP request response message can be more confusing, considering
> the new extension to EAP such as ERX (draft-ietf-hokey-erx) where two
> new messages are defined that are neither request nor response.
> Considering ERX, I would strongly discourage combining DHCP and EAP
> because ERX can make integration of DHCP and EAP even more difficult.
> It is best if we separate IP address configuration from network access
> authentication.
>
> Regards,
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 08:41:44AM +1000, Richard Pruss wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To help the discussion next week I was prompted to put out a  
>> summary of
>> changes.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03
>>
>> We have tried in this version to address concerns raised in IETF 70.
>> Jari and Ralph's preso may remind you of those:
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/intarea-2/sld1.htm
>>
>> We have added a first draft proposal for DHCPv6 messages for a  
>> limited
>> set of IPv6 deployments.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03#section-5.2
>>
>> We now have added a DHCP relay model to the DHCP proxy/server model  
>> that
>> was the document model.
>> (DHCP proxy is a term used in the DSL architectures, where the BRAS  
>> acts
>> as a server to the client.)
>>
>> We have added a section on fragmentation.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03#section-8
>>
>> The DHCP EAP request response messages are now separate messages to
>> possibly make the flow clearer
>> and hopefully make the discussion around DHCP vs EAP retransmission
>> responsibility easier for people to understand.
>>
>> There is a section on backwards compatibility and a number of cases
>> considered, no updates to that but it addresses one of the bullets on
>> the slides in IETF-70.
>>
>> - Ric
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg