IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 06 August 2023 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6743DC15106A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 07:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9H1hn8SqDHB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 07:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69318C14CE4A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 07:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CECB3898C; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 10:27:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pRWflYI4txcc; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 10:27:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010223898B; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 10:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1691332032; bh=dPKHEyESC/O4TABc0uwcvC6w9oGNBwl9ZhHsxs35l1E=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HiEnYXA/uKlH4mGbU/5N36bhzfahNVIHN4yt/DH7zxATC7CkynMc8+sW+H4MkNdEL RGWexIVbJaHTCyrBbGs8glSoV2Zl6jKzi2392ZDgnSGojc/h/hJZYaKOK2T6/vKIPR 98hZGL3XPCWxbvfg1yOYbfBCKEBB+QbzyRDfC3ddA/S3Bs6gXv1R3eXUB+Cn7oOFi5 S/VCImapxgMGil/ktndGrtFSHZEek25DLd1798MDv19NDgCrHJxHj539BmNTX3c3FW 5dGbiF8tIs71uLUk/y4JACMrQ+cEwBNdoiOPPmolTZ97wSzN18StY6bXb0qw4pVML0 XzAfC1lKh6HWA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B3615F; Sun, 6 Aug 2023 10:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGGiuEZ0TAFTWWwRFLXYUnN=F98oB0y-EqYOn3_POfGRCiKh5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17006.1691258926@localhost> <A6DBF4F0-D9D1-44DF-8524-35950E4C9367@gmail.com> <16781.1691266900@localhost> <CAGGiuEZ0TAFTWWwRFLXYUnN=F98oB0y-EqYOn3_POfGRCiKh5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 10:27:11 -0400
Message-ID: <26852.1691332031@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/vNLAHwIRyGXtLyLUSGu1KKg1Qag>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 14:27:20 -0000

Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Modem---- R2 (wire+wireless.Node) with no setting opt for home user
    > device at exp. /lifetime, it auto ipcfg was 1D lease while meantime ,
    > modem....would displayed lease 1 hour due to R2 net suddenly invalid?!



    > Moden----R1 (wire. DHCP wan set replaced SLAAC, see going) ----R2
    >                                   |
    >                                   ----pc1
    >                                   |
    >                                   ---pc2
    >                                   |
    >                                    ---R0


I think you are asking about resulting lifetime, in some situation where R2
got prefix from R1 via DHCPv6-PD?

Your diagram, is unclear if pc1/pc2/R0 are connected to R1 or R2.

    > By the way, 2002:c058:.... that ever ISP test dhcpv6 shown unknown by
    > host detector hyperlinks...., Is DHCP v6 expired or deleted from public
    > register such IANA , or it performing in privacy DNS just?

This makes no sense to me. Can you rephrase?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email