Re: [dhcwg] draft-yang-dhc-ipv4-dis-01
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1D121F8593 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.851, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-HK+fhT8HYD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC77A21F858E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUAlyBzvSPYZJ9mDJgJqQTxJxSkh14mlU@postini.com; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:58:16 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7C41B8310 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E52319005D; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:58:14 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: yangtianle <yangtianle@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-yang-dhc-ipv4-dis-01
Thread-Index: AQHNZmC1evhIu2B8UUi7uy4olciUPJcyuMKA
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:58:14 +0000
Message-ID: <F1562890-B52E-4D48-A279-E1AA7E68292E@nominum.com>
References: <SNT120-W2F6A8F76032615FE0818BC5D40@phx.gbl> <SNT120-W19004ECAAB2B7BFF577785C5D80@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <SNT120-W19004ECAAB2B7BFF577785C5D80@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F1562890B52E4D48A279E1AA7E68292Enominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-yang-dhc-ipv4-dis-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:57:21 -0000
On Jul 20, 2012, at 6:16 AM, yangtianle wrote: Could you help me sending the mail to the WG? I don't know why my mail was rejected twice. The message was rejected because it contained javascript code meant to be executed by the email program; this is not appropriate. There were also headers that the mail program didn't like. The option that you're proposing sounds like a DHCPv4 protocol extension similar to the SOL_MAX_RT extension for DHCPv6. What test results are you talking about?
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-yang-dhc-ipv4-dis-01 Ted Lemon