Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft
Vijay Bhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com> Wed, 23 January 2002 18:51 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA20427 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:51:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id NAA11248 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:51:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA10549; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:36:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA10527 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:36:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA19744 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:36:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dce.india.hp.com (dce.india.hp.com [15.10.45.122]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC28CE004A4; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from vijayak@localhost) by dce.india.hp.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id AAA04214; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:10:28 +0530 (IST)
From: Vijay Bhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com>
Message-Id: <200201231840.AAA04214@dce.india.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft
To: mellon@nominum.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:10:27 +0530
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, vijayak@india.hp.com
In-Reply-To: <51B1D23E-1024-11D6-AF3C-00039317663C@nominum.com> from Ted Lemon at Jan "23, " 2002 "06:12:02" pm
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.2 $]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> What possible use can there be in allowing the client to select the prefix > that it wants? Please go through the follow scenario. Router is advertising 3ffe::/64 prefix and a host has generated an address of prefix 3ffe::/64 using router advertisements. Now, the host needs some more addresses of prefix 3ffe::/64. It chooses to use stateful autoconf (dhcpv6). The server sends advertise saying that, it can allocate addresses in 3ffe::/64 and 5ffe::/64. Since, the client's wish is to get only 3ffe::/64, it can tell the server its preference for the prefix while sending Request. This will help in server not allocating the addresses that the client doesn't want. Moreover, if the client wants to communicate with the external site, it requires global rather than site local addresses. Here also, it can show the preference. DHCP clients are intended to arrange for ad-hoc > connections. Under what circumstances would the client have any knowledge > of what prefixes might be better than others? Obviosuly, the client using the stateless autoconf, knows the prefixes in the link, (by router advertisements). From the Advertise messages of the various servers, it knows about the prefixes in the link. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Vijay Bhaskar A K
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] Comments on 22 rev of the draft Martin Stiemerling
- [dhcwg] Question on DHCPv6 Draft 23. Paul Tan