Re: [Diffserv] Comments on the TCB of the Conceptual Model - msg 1 of 2

"John Strassner" <jstrassn@cisco.com> Thu, 29 June 2000 07:13 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA23520 for <diffserv-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 03:13:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09139; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:53:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09108 for <diffserv@ns.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23348 for <diffserv@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:53:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mira-sjcm-1.cisco.com (mira-sjcm-1.cisco.com [171.69.2.212]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA05630; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jstrassnlap (sj-dial-4-10.cisco.com [171.68.181.139]) by mira-sjcm-1.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with SMTP id AFW00168; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <093701bfe196$ea5bec20$15b544ab@cisco.com>
From: John Strassner <jstrassn@cisco.com>
To: Andrew Smith <andrew@extremenetworks.com>, diffserv@ietf.org
References: <808F64DDB492D3119D3C00508B5D8D733ECB00@SOL>
Subject: Re: [Diffserv] Comments on the TCB of the Conceptual Model - msg 1 of 2
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:46:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Diffserv Discussion List <diffserv.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: diffserv@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I got this from several hall discussions. So if this isn't
true, then what is the rationale for separating elements
into the four categories that you've defined? Especially
since all of them, from a modeling point-of-view, provide
actions...

regards,
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Smith" <andrew@extremenetworks.com>
To: "'John Strassner'" <jstrassn@cisco.com>;
<diffserv@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Diffserv] Comments on the TCB of the
Conceptual Model - msg 1 of 2


> John,
>
> I don't know where you get the idea that "number of inputs
and outputs" is
> the fundemental taxonomy of the components of this model.
It's not.
>
> Andrew
>
>


_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/