Re: [Diffserv] Comments on the TCB of the Conceptual Model - msg 1 of 2

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

John,

I think the best thing is for the model authors to noodle to put
together a considered response to your comments... this will
clearly take more than a moment or two. But thanks very much
for your detailed review.

  Brian

John Strassner wrote:
> 
> I got this from several hall discussions. So if this isn't
> true, then what is the rationale for separating elements
> into the four categories that you've defined? Especially
> since all of them, from a modeling point-of-view, provide
> actions...
> 
> regards,
> John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Smith" <[e-mail]>
> To: "'John Strassner'" <[e-mail]>;
> <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [Diffserv] Comments on the TCB of the
> Conceptual Model - msg 1 of 2
> 
> > John,
> >
> > I don't know where you get the idea that "number of inputs
> and outputs" is
> > the fundemental taxonomy of the components of this model.
> It's not.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/