Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-09

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Zorn [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:12 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-09
> 
> On 5/25/2011 6:34 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >>> T2: Are there any special recommendations for the experts who will
> > be
> >>> in charge in the future with the "Expert Review" policy as per
> >>> [RFC5226] for AVP types?
> >>
> >> Do you mean values for the Key-Type AVP?  No such recommendations
> > would
> >> come from me; we had originally specified the policy as "First
Come,
> >> First Served"
> >> (http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-wu-dime-local-keytran-
> >> 03.txt)
> >> on the simple theory that anybody who wanted to register, use &
> >> deploy e.g. rot13 would get what they deserved ;-).  IIRC, one of
> the
> >> dime Chairs suggested the expert review policy, so maybe they have
> >> some suggestions.
> >>
> >> ...
> >
> > [[DR]] Can you please clarify this with the chairs? If the policy is
> > "Expert Review" criteria for reviewing requests for new Key-Type AVP
> > values should be specified.
> 
> I would prefer to change the policy to "Specification Required"
because
> this seems to be all that is really necessary for interoperability.
> 

[[DR]] The WG needs to agree on this change. I would like to hear the
opinions of other WG participants and of the chair(s). 

Dan