[Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-09

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, 

I have reviewed draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-09. The document is in
good shape, I have a small number of issues which seem simple to respond
and fix if necessary, so I suggest that you do it before submitting the
document to IETF Last Call. 

Technical Issues are marked T and Editorial issues are marked E. 

Technical:

T1: Is there any special reason for skipping decimal value (4) in the
enumeration in Section 3.1.1? If there is none I suggest to move RSA-KEM
from (5) to (4). 

T2: Are there any special recommendations for the experts who will be in
charge in the future with the "Expert Review" policy as per [RFC5226]
for AVP types? For example is it recommended to assign AVPs only for
cryptographic key material defined in IETF standard track documents? 

T3. In section  5.2: 

   'once values have been assigned, they MUST NOT be deleted, replaced,
modified or deprecated.' 

It is not clear why we do not allow for values to be deprecated.
Assuming that a cryptographic delivery method was deprecated, why would
not marking the AVP as deprecated be allowed, as long as the value
cannot be deleted, replaced or modified? 

Editorial: 

E1: Why is RSA-KEM not expanded and explained in Section 2.2. -
Technical Terms and Acronyms?


Thanks and Regards,

Dan