Re: [Dime] fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 06 December 2011 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398A321F8B3B for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:36:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YJsmcsHEqyp for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460C221F8B36 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by laap9 with SMTP id p9so139402laa.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:36:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=snR14n421Vp5VcTMKcwk/srqTCjFaPENqt7p4o2C+N8=; b=doOE53OnTfuuPsG8SXg9f/I6ClsAlc68u43xWCZRySy2pkjM3mv7FZNCkUHLTAqVsb iQRVGJXoM6mA6JwZKiXAKsrgvz+WrH1o4fCyfkWl1uG0bRssg+DavvPuJCZTxEySmHVS Uqs44e4m+Y5qHLFujwnpIUlcbNDzu4Xp3nk4g=
Received: by 10.152.134.179 with SMTP id pl19mr8518657lab.13.1323164166060; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [188.117.15.109] ([188.117.15.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nj4sm20352952lab.12.2011.12.06.01.36.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EDDDFFD.7060005@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:36:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0DC0C827-7510-4163-B89A-5921E0299793@gmail.com>
References: <1ECBE0F0-5658-4DAD-B7EC-B06DFAF02E9F@gmail.com> <6A3D0DF3-3D5F-4753-984F-52F88B689192@gmx.net> <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577FC9012@ftrdmel1> <B98828E4-4CF9-488F-9189-719DC5C280EE@gmail.com> <4EDDDFFD.7060005@gmail.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:36:08 -0000

Glen,

The "voices" we got for preserving the I-D for yet another round came from the authors. If the authors still want to give it another try, let them have it.

- Jouni

On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Glen Zorn wrote:

> On 12/2/2011 2:18 PM, jouni korhonen wrote:
>> Folks,
>> 
>> We got two voices for preserving the design guidelines and apart from the discussion during the Taipei meeting none against. We'll keep the I-D still for a while in charter.
>> 
> 
> Interesting way to measure WG "consensus".  How many people are on the
> dime mailing list?  According to your conditions, all but 2 of those
> people are considered to be "voting" no, but apparently those 2 override
> the rest...
> 
>> - Jouni
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:59 PM, <lionel.morand@orange.com> <lionel.morand@orange.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Give me a last chance! :)
>>> 8 months is not so long. 
> 
> The draft _expired_ 8 months ago; this means that nobody has bothered to
> update even the version # & date in more than a year.  OTOH, if "8
> months is not so long", that may explain why it is considered acceptable
> for 4 months (instead of 4 minutes)  to elapse between the end of WGLC
> and the creation of a 1 page proto write-up...
> 
>> And we were waiting anyway the publication of the 3588 Bis-version.
> 
> I did you expect that 3588bis was going to change so drastically as to
> invalidate your work?
> 
>>> I will initiate a mail with at least the points that I would like to see clarified with this document. And we can use it to set-up after that a confcall. Is it OK?
>>> 
>>> Lionel
>>> 
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net] 
>>> Envoyé : lundi 21 novembre 2011 10:19
>>> À : jouni korhonen
>>> Cc : Hannes Tschofenig; dime@ietf.org; MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS; Victor Fajardo
>>> Objet : Re: fate of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide 
>>> 
>>> Hi Jouni, 
>>> 
>>> I believe the document is valuable but I suggest that the authors schedule a conference call to make a proposal to the group on how to finish it. 
>>> 
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes
>>> 
>>> On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:43 AM, jouni korhonen wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Folks,
>>>> 
>>>> Anyone has something against it if we withdrawn draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide ? The I-D expired 8 months ago and has been in the WG since August 2007. 
>>>> 
>>>> Voice your opinion *against* the withdrawn by 2nd Dec. Silence will be counted as 'yes' for withdrawn.
>>>> 
>>>> - Jouni
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>